Humanitarian Work in Search of a Future

© UN News – Children in Gaza wait to fill their empty saucepans with food

Humanitarian crises are caused by wars, disasters, and epidemics, most often in poor countries. The response to these crises relies first on local community solidarity, followed by assistance from international humanitarian organizations. These, in turn, depend on the response capabilities of humanitarian actors, public and private funding, access to victims, and cooperation among relief actors on the ground.

The sharp decline in public humanitarian funding, geopolitical fragmentation, and the erosion of international humanitarian law are severely impacting relief efforts for victims.

Thus, one of the immediate effects of the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran is to block all trade in the Strait of Hormuz, with multiple global consequences that notably affect the export of fertilizers essential for agriculture, particularly in the poorest countries. This also carries a high risk of triggering a food crisis in the Middle East! This war is spreading to Lebanon, which already has over one million displaced people, including 350,000 children, more than a thousand deaths, and the risk of southern Lebanon being annexed with no possibility of the population returning, as Israel has declared.

This editorial, like every other article from this edition of Défis Humanitaires, aim at providing analysis, testimonies, examples, tools for readers as well as actors of geopolitics, humanitarian work, their partners and parlementaries, journalists, Think Tanks and Faculties, followers and doners who help making possible the publication of Défis Humanitaires.

 

Factors Driving Global Geopolitical Change.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine, the ouster of President Maduro in Venezuela, Donald Trump’s re-election, the U.S.-Israeli attack on Iran, and other threats are upending international relations, risking the very denial of the rule of law.

The return of empires, the symmetrical assertiveness of nation-states, and the emergence of countries in the “Global South” are major contributors to this ongoing dynamic of fragmentation, conflict, and recomposition.

In this context, the president of the world’s leading power, Donald Trump, has as his sole agenda “America Trump First,” which blends both isolationism and interventionism in all global affairs based on the “deal” of power dynamics and interests.

Meeting between heads of states and governements in London to support Volodymyr Zelenky after his altercation with Donald Trump on February 28 at the White House. © European Union, 2025

This aggression will have the opposite effect of radicalizing all parties and situations, as we can see from the increase in defense budgets! Does this make the world any safer, and doesn’t this constant escalation inevitably lead to war in all its forms?

And this does nothing to address, beyond the legitimate interests of each country, the challenges facing all of humanity—challenges that are all sources of collective danger: climate change, melting glaciers, pollution, loss of biodiversity, the drinking water crisis, epidemics, demographics, the criminal economy, the potential proliferation of military nuclear weapons, and so on.

In this new context, the weakening of the UN and of multilateralism equally diminishes the institutions capable of regulation through negotiation.

And yet, we must effectively coordinate the global trade necessary for 8 billion people—who will number 10 billion in 25 years, with Africa’s population set to double! Where are the plans to anticipate this demographic shock? What will be the consequences of our lack of preparation?

 

Strengths, Weaknesses, and Prospects for the Humanitarian Sector.

In a new context where we are witnessing the erosion of international law and where the humanitarian sector is likely to lose half of its public funding, it is useful to take stock of the situation to identify its strengths—so as to optimize them—and its weaknesses—so as to address them—and to explore new avenues and methods yet to be devised.

Without claiming to be exhaustive, these strengths are first and foremost those of commitment and the motivation to act to save lives. They also include responsiveness and pragmatism, as well as professional experience and expertise. There are donor support networks and the coordination of organizations with donors as well as on the ground. Above all, we must not forget the proximity to local populations, public opinion, the media, and government authorities—both in the countries that provide aid and in the countries where it is implemented for populations at risk.

On the downside, we note a lack of strategic foresight, though this is offset, it is true, by a strong capacity for adaptation. We should also highlight the weakness of communication, which is primarily directed at its own staff and which, despite donor support, struggles to break out of its silo and gain broader influence. With a few rare exceptions, NGOs’ business models are either fragile or dependent, lacking significant capacity for investment and renewal.

The mixed Solidarités International-Véolia team around an Aquaforce 2000 in Ukraine. Photo : Veolia Foundation

This brief overview lays the groundwork for a number of initiatives aimed at strengthening our organization while adapting—and even transforming. With this in mind, let us highlight a few potential avenues for progress.

  • Forge new alliances with individual donors, institutional donors, businesses and foundations, the media, research centers, and among humanitarian organizations themselves.
  • Revamp communication by documenting the human consequences of crises with concrete and compelling examples.
  • Better measure the impact of the actions implemented and demonstrate to the public how the resources mobilized improve the lives of populations at risk and save lives, while establishing sustainable responses to essential needs.
  • Show how innovation and pooling of resources enable us to be closer to the people, act more quickly, be more effective, and optimize resources and every euro.
  • At a more strategic level, demonstrate how human security is a prerequisite for international security, as well as why and how national solidarity is compatible with international solidarity.
  • Share, illustrate, and promote the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence as the foundation of all action, while avoiding the risks of politicization and division that would weaken us.

Défis Humanitaires doesn’t have all the answers, but our journal explores avenues, solutions, and options both within and outside the “toolbox.” Please feel free to send us your comments and suggestions at: contact@defishumanitaires.com

Défis Humanitaires’ Commitment to You.

Défis Humanitaires is a nonprofit organization established under the French law of 1901 that publishes an independent, free online journal. The costs of this publication are covered by the volunteer work of its expert committee members and numerous contributors (complete list of contributors), as well as by humanitarian and geopolitical networks and by donors who make each new issue possible.

If we were to think in terms of a “business model,” there would be nothing. What makes the difference for Défis Humanitaires are the convictions, the commitment, the experience gained, the friends, donors, and authors without whom this would not exist. And now we are also witnessing the emergence of a new geopolitical era where confrontation is taking hold and war looms, at the very moment when public humanitarian and development funding is collapsing while needs are growing.

This Issue 111 is emblematic of our journal. You will discover a fascinating interview with Maurice Gourdault-Montagne, a seasoned diplomat, who explains the past to us and sheds light on the present and the future. We are very excited to publish testimonials from NGOs such as Électriciens Sans Frontières (ESF), with its president Hervé Gouyet, who presents the results of four years of engagement in Ukraine.

© Électriciens Sans Frontières – Électriciens Sans Frontières in Ukraine

Similarly, we hear from the Solinfo association, which has been active in Bangladesh for 22 years, with a field report that takes us along with Thierry Liebaut, its secretary general, who has just returned from there. In the field of innovation, following last month’s presentation of the remarkable tool, the Solis bot, Antoine Vaccaro of Force For Good offers us a remarkable analysis of philanthropy in times of chaos. Regarding global access to drinking water and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 2015–2030), Gérard Payen, vice president of the French Water Partnership, provides an overview of the current situation and strategic challenges of the upcoming UN World Water Summit, which will take place in December 2026 in Abu Dhabi.

 

A New Défis Humanitaires.

In the face of ongoing geopolitical and humanitarian upheavals, our magazine must adapt, evolve, and change to better fulfill its mission and meet readers’ expectations.

This process concerns both content and form. How can we adapt our editorial line to the new geopolitical context? How can we interpret current events to anticipate the world to come? How can we reposition the humanitarian sector, which has been hit hard by the drastic decline in public funding? How can we mobilize new partners and allies? How can we adapt, change, and reinvent ourselves?

How can we adapt our layout and offer new features to our readers? What direction should we take in terms of graphic identity to better express a renewed editorial line?

Please feel free to share your thoughts on these questions with us. It’s very simple—just write to us at contact@defishumanitaires.com

However, while volunteer work is essential to achieving this, it is not enough on its own. We urgently need your support to cover the costs of this new layout and to expand our editorial team so that we can fully develop our content, including articles, testimonials, interviews, and visual materials.

I am therefore appealing to the generosity of our readers—who are our closest and most loyal supporters—by inviting you to make a donation at (faireundon), for which you will receive a tax receipt entitling you to a tax deduction of 66% of the amount donated.

Thank you very much for your support of Défis Humanitaires, a unique monthly magazine that hopes to bring this project to fruition thanks to you. Thank you.

Alain Boinet.

President of Défis Humanitaires.


Alain Boinet is the president of the association Défis Humanitaires which publishes the online review www.defishumanitaires.com. He is the founder of the humanitarian association Solidarités International of which he was director general for 35 years. Moreover, he is a member of the Humanitarian Consultation Group with the Crisis and Support Center of the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, member of the Board of Directors of Solidarités International, of the French Water Partnership (PFE), of the Véolia Foundation, of the Think Tank (re)sources. He continues to go to the field (north-east Syria, Haut-Karabagh/Artsakh and Armenia) and to testify in the media.


Discover the other articles of this edition :

Philanthropy in times of Chaos

© WFP/Arete/Ali Yunes – Smoke and dust rises in the aftermath of airstrikes in a southern suburb of Beirut, the capital of Lebanon.

Learning to Navigate a World That Has Lost Its West

For a long time, the nonprofit and philanthropic sector operated in a world that was imperfect but relatively predictable. Crises existed, of course, but they seemed localized, temporary, and manageable. Public funding remained generally predictable, multilateralism provided a stabilizing framework, and generosity grew slowly but surely.

That world is, if not disappearing, at least changing rapidly.

Over the past decade, a succession of shocks—an increase in terrorist attacks, a pandemic, high-intensity wars, climate change, geopolitical upheaval, and democratic polarization—has cracked the very foundations of this balance.

What many today describe as “chaos” is not merely an accumulation of crises. It is a regime change.

For the humanitarian sector, philanthropy, and the nonprofit world, this rupture is brutal. Budgets are shrinking, trade-offs are becoming more severe, and economic models are being called into question. But reducing the situation to a crisis of resources would be a mistake in analysis. What we are experiencing runs deeper: a crisis of models, of perceptions, of certainties.

The End of a Predictable World

The multilateral system, long viewed as an unshakable foundation, exemplifies this shift. The United Nations and major humanitarian agencies are now facing an unprecedented contraction of their resources. The withdrawal or massive reduction of certain government funding—particularly from the United States—is resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths, thousands of job cuts, program closures, and the abandonment of programs.

On the ground, this translates into impossible choices: prioritizing certain populations at the expense of others, raising intervention thresholds, and accepting to “save what can be saved” rather than addressing overall needs. A logic of triage is taking hold, not out of cynicism, but out of necessity. The humanitarian sector, for example, is entering a state of permanent war economy.

This reality is not without resonance for the French nonprofit sector. Here too, the end of the illusion of stability is palpable. The number of donors is declining, even as the average donation increases. Generosity is becoming concentrated, institutionalized, more strategic, and more demanding. Organizations must cope with increased volatility in resources and heightened competition, not only among causes but for attention itself.

We are thus shifting from a world of planning to a world of navigation. From a world where we mapped out five-year trajectories to an environment marked by constant crossroads, enduring uncertainty, and successive shocks.

27.02.2025 – The end of USAID, Washington, DC USA © Ted Eytan

The Transformation of Generosity

Faced with this instability, two opposing reactions threaten the sector. The first is nostalgia: the hope—often implicit—for a “return to normal,” for the restoration of previous balances, for a mechanical rebound in the curves. The second is shock: the temptation to believe that everything is collapsing, that generosity will dry up under the weight of fear, recession, and self-absorption.

These two interpretations fall short. For what we are observing is neither a mere hiccup nor an outright collapse. It is a transformation.

Generosity is not disappearing; it is changing form. It is becoming more selective, more embodied, more attentive to real impact. It is shifting from institutions to people, from systems to stories, from structures to embodied causes. It is becoming, in the noble sense, more political.

This shift is accompanied by a profound change in approach. Delegated philanthropy, where organizations were entrusted to act on our behalf, is gradually giving way to a philanthropy of shared responsibility. Donors, patrons, and citizens want to understand, participate, and engage in new ways. They expect consistency, transparence and meaning.

A cash transfer program led by UNICEF in Mauritania in 2021

From Performance to Resilience

In this context, the central issue is no longer just performance, but resilience.

Being resilient is not just about resisting. It is about being able to withstand shocks, adapt, and transform without losing one’s raison d’être. Whereas older models prioritized linear growth and optimization, the world ahead demands agility, hybridization, and cooperation.

In practical terms, this means breaking out of silos, forging more alliances, pooling certain functions, and diversifying resources. It also requires rethinking governance, relationships with stakeholders, and the role of communities, volunteers, and local regions.

In a world saturated with causes and information, the ability to tell a story that is accurate, compelling, and inspiring becomes a strategic lever. Being morally right is no longer enough. We must be understandable, appealing, and credible. The question is no longer just “how much have we raised?” but “what movement have we created? What coalition have we built? What transformation have we made possible?”

Navigating Rather Than Enduring

History shows that major reinventions of solidarity rarely arise from a place of comfort. They emerge from cracks, during periods of turmoil, when old frameworks no longer hold. The nonprofit sector was not born out of stability; it was born out of chaos.

We are once again at one of those pivotal moments. Not on the eve of a collapse, but on the threshold of a restructuring. A demanding, uncomfortable, yet potentially fruitful restructuring.

Emerging from this period stronger than before will not mean restoring the models of the past. It will mean accepting a shift in mindset. To shift from a transactional mindset to one of commitment, from a project-based mindset to a trajectory-based one, from an organizational mindset to an ecosystem-based one.

Chaos is not merely a threat. It is also a revelation. It lays bare our dependencies, forcing us to distinguish the essential from the incidental, to question our goals rather than merely our tools.

Learning to navigate a world without a compass is undoubtedly the major challenge facing philanthropy today. Not to simply endure the turbulence, but to transform this period of uncertainty into a defining moment.

Article based on the opening and closing remarks from Good Week 2026, organized by Force For Good

Antoine Vaccaro.

President of Force for Good.


Antoine Vaccaro :

He holds a Ph.D. in Organizational Sciences—Management of the Non-Profit Sector—from Paris-Dauphine University. After a career with major nongovernmental organizations and communications firms, such as the Fondation de France, Médecins du Monde, and TBWA, he now serves as president of Force For Good and Cerphi (Center for the Study and Research on Philanthropy).

He also serves in various administrative roles within associations and has co-founded several professional organizations promoting private funding for causes of public interest, including the Association Française des Fundraisers, Euconsult, and the ESSEC Chair in Philanthropy. He has also contributed to the drafting of the code of ethics for organizations that rely on public generosity.

Finally, he is the author of several books and articles on philanthropy and fundraising.


Discover the other articles of this edition :