Conference for Sudan : urgent need for action

Since April 15, 2023, Sudan has been plunged into civil war. At least 14,000 people have been killed – a figure that is almost certainly underestimated – and tens of thousands wounded. 25 million people – half the population – are in need of humanitarian assistance. Nearly 9 million people have already fled their homes as a result of the conflict, 1.8 million of whom have taken refuge in neighbouring countries. There are countless chilling accounts from displaced men, women and children of the appalling violence they have had to endure. Finally, far from being resolved, the conflict is sinking deeper and deeper into crisis, threatening the lives of hundreds of thousands of Sudanese.

On September 21, 2023 in Adré, eastern Chad, 7-year-old Hussam Ali drinks water while sitting on the belongings his family was able to take with them as they fled the town of Murnei in West Darfur.
CHAD – September 2023 – © Abdulmonam Eassa

An international conference to ring the alarm

At the initiative of France, Germany and the European Union, an International Humanitarian Conference for Sudan and neighboring countries was held in Paris on April 15, 2024. Bringing together 58 states, including countries from the region and donor countries, as well as the main regional organizations and the heads of several United Nations agencies, it raised only half of the $4.01 billion requested by the United Nations: $1.4 billion for a regional refugee response plan to help 2.7 million people in five neighboring countries, and $2.7 billion for a national humanitarian response plan targeting 14.7 million people in Sudan itself – a figure to be set against the 25 million people in need of aid.

Afraa (first name changed), armed men entered the family home and unleashed their fury on her and her loved ones.
CHAD – September 2023 – ©Abdulmonam Eassa

This conference comes after months of apathy and silence from the international community. At a time when more and more people are facing hunger, disease and forced displacement, and when the economy and basic services have collapsed, the humanitarian response plan has hitherto received only 5% funding. In this respect, the Conference is a welcome but belated wake-up call.

NGOs mobilize to counter looming famine

Speech by Kevin Goldberg, Executive Director of Solidarités International, at the International Humanitarian Conference for Sudan and neighboring countries.

Local and international NGOs, including Solidarités International, were invited as witnesses and direct players in the aid effort in Sudan and neighboring countries, and were able to stress the absolute necessity of speeding up financial commitments to avert a famine situation that unfortunately seems increasingly unavoidable, and which we must contain with all our might.

Indeed, the destruction of agricultural infrastructures, rising food prices and the impossibility of cultivating land due to the fighting mean that the lean season, from June to September, will be extremely difficult for the population. What’s more, the rainy season, which coincides with the lean season, will make many roads impassable due to flooding, limiting the delivery of aid. Already, an estimated 17.7 million people – more than the current population of the Netherlands – are facing high levels of acute food insecurity.

This crisis requires additional and immediately available resources. We need to increase the volume of emergency aid, but also pre-position massive food reserves in anticipation of the rainy season, deploy capacities to treat acute malnutrition, and ensure access to water and hygiene to prevent the water-borne diseases that accompany hunger from also wreaking havoc.

Furthermore, while emergency aid is vital, it cannot be the only response. Donors must also reinvest massively in longer-term aid for the region, to strengthen the resilience of communities hosting people fleeing conflict. Local food systems, put under even greater pressure by this protracted crisis, must also be widely supported.

Humanitarian aid extremely difficult to deliver

SUDAN – SIRBA clean-up campaigns – 01/02/2024 – Solidarités International

Through our speeches, we have also been able to underline how access to populations in need of aid remains extremely laborious in Sudan. Firstly, because of the prevailing security instability: aid delivery is possible but dangerous, and the safety of our humanitarian colleagues is not sufficiently guaranteed. Secondly, deteriorating infrastructure and limited access to conflict zones considerably increase the cost of transporting personnel and equipment. High inflation, currency depreciation and supply chain disruptions also contribute to the rising cost of essential goods, putting further pressure on our already limited resources. Finally, we face too many bureaucratic obstacles, from visa restrictions to an insufficient number of border crossings.

An effort to be maintained

Map of Sudan and surrounding countries.

Two points in conclusion. Firstly, while the many statements made by government representatives were encouraging, global efforts must continue after the conference. Our task will be to ensure that the funding announced materializes very quickly, and that it is additional to previous commitments. Let’s not forget the domino effect of this crisis: instability in Sudan threatens the entire region, and in particular already fragile countries facing their own humanitarian and economic challenges – Chad, South Sudan, Egypt, Ethiopia and the Central African Republic. This is why a more coordinated international response is needed at regional level.

Secondly, while securing funding to get aid to the people as quickly as possible is crucial, it is not enough. It must be repeated again and again: all players in the conflict must respect international humanitarian law and protect civilians and humanitarian workers. And we need diplomatic pressure from all stakeholders to achieve this. In the meantime, we await a peace agreement that will finally enable us to break the vicious cycle of violence in which Sudan is currently locked.

 

Click here to access the YouTube replay of the Conference and listen to Kevin Goldberg’s speech.

You will find here the official press release from the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs on the Conference.

 

Kevin Goldberg
Chief Executive Officer, Solidarités International 

Resolutely focused on the general interest and improving the living conditions of the most disadvantaged populations, Kevin Goldberg began his career working with members of parliament and local elected representatives, first in Brussels and then in Paris. In 2013, he joined the Cabinet of the Chairman of the Management Board of GROUPE SOS, a major player in social cohesion in France and worldwide, as Head of Development and Partnerships. In 2017, he became head of the Group’s international sector, where he and his teams developed projects on the themes of access to primary healthcare in the Sahel, the protection of forest cover in Southeast Asia, and the development of social entrepreneurship in southern Africa, the Maghreb and the Balkans. In January 2021, Kevin will join the humanitarian NGO SOLIDARITÉS INTERNATIONAL as CEO, whose 3,000 employees work in over 25 countries facing the most severe crises. A graduate of Sciences Po Grenoble, the College of Europe and Université Paris Dauphine-PSL, Kevin is also a member of the Board of Coordination SUD.

Humanitarian chisel effect, risk or reality!

An Editorial by Alain Boinet.

The chisel effect is an economic phenomenon in which the amount of resources and the amount of costs evolve in opposite ways. Regarding humanitarian aid, after a continuous growth of humanitarian budgets, does not the increase of the needs facing a decrease of the means illustrate a dangerous humanitarian chisel effect. Is it a simple pause or the beginning of a ebb? This is an essential question for humanitarians.

It was a ebb that occurred in 2023, according to OCHA, when faced with growing humanitarian needs, we experienced declining funding. Indeed, to help 245 million people, we needed 56.7 billion USD. But only USD 19.9 billion has been mobilized, or 35% of the needs, where the usual average was 51 to 64% for 10 years (2013-2022)!

Percentage of funding to needs, UN calls from 2013 to 2023. © Global Humanitarian assistance report 2023

The immediate consequence is that we were able to rescue only 128 million people out of the 245 million planned in 2023! What happened to the other 117 million human beings left behind because of lack of resources? Would the chisel effect have closed in on them.

At the 3rd European Humanitarian Forum, on 18 and 19 March 2024 in Brussels, Janez Lenarcic, European Commissioner for Humanitarian Affairs with ECHO, said: «Make no mistake, the humanitarian lifeboat is sinking»! The message is clear and must be taken seriously on the eve of the June European elections in the Member States with this autumn a new presidency, a new college of commissioners, a new budget for the next 5 years. The stakes are high as some institutional humanitarian budgets decline.

What will happen in 2024 to OCHA’s appeal to rescue 180 million people with an expected budget of USD 46.4 billion? 180 million people at risk in 2024 compared to 230 million in 2023 following a new methodology for needs analysis. In the face of dwindling resources, the number of people to be rescued has been reduced thanks to JIAF 2.0, which “sets global standards for estimating and analyzing humanitarian needs and protection risks.” The coincidence with the chisel effect is unfortunate. It will be necessary to question this new methodology to the definition of which United Nations agencies and NGOs have contributed in particular.

This methodology may have the merit of greater precision and division of responsibilities between the major players in international aid. But we must also ask ourselves what has become of the people “out of the ordinary” excluded from humanitarian aid. Have development agencies supported them? Or, on the contrary, have these vulnerable people remained alone on the verge of solidarity?

In this context, the key word that currently mobilizes the humanitarian ecosystem is the prioritization of aid. Prioritization is a selection and it cannot fail to make us think about the sorting of wounded in war surgery when we can not save everyone and must choose!

So, precisely, what will be the vital humanitarian needs for the populations victims of wars, disasters and epidemics in the coming years?

When the butterfly effect comes to challenge the scissors effect.

We asked ourselves this question in these columns in March. Could the butterfly effect of conflicts lead to a «domino effect» the «20 years of chaos» that some fear?

The reason I highlight the geopolitical causes of humanitarian consequences is that I have experienced them during more than four decades of humanitarian aid around the world. There are of course also the growing causes related to climate and major epidemics that we will come back to. But we know that the vast majority of humanitarian needs result from conflicts in all their forms and that these seem to be entering a historical phase of expansion.

We remember that Raymond Aron declared the time of the cold war «Impossible peace, improbable war». Perhaps it is necessary to say today with regard to international tensions «Improbable peace, possible war»!

Military parade on the Red Square in Moscow, Russia in 2013. © VLADJ55

Speaking to the European press on 29 March, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said, “We must get used to the fact that a new era has begun: the pre-war era. I’m not exaggerating.” “If Ukraine loses, no one in Europe will feel safe.” «War is no longer a concept of the past in Europe, now entered the era of the pre-war». “The most worrying thing right now is that absolutely all scenarios are possible.”

If, at the beginning of the Russian military offensive in Ukraine, we could ask ourselves the question of the responsibilities on the various causes of this war, two years later, faced with a high intensity war that will last, faced with the risk of a defeat of Ukraine, the question arises otherwise. What consequences would a defeat of Ukraine entail while Vladimir Putin plays his game and opposes us another political model, like his Chinese ally. Have we not, without yet knowing it, entered into the beginning of a more general war which will sooner or later necessarily lead us to war economy with what consequences on needs as on humanitarian means?

The tone is also rising in Asia with the edition of the standard map of China in the daily Global Times, quasi-official organ of the Chinese Communist Party. This map now includes the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, southern part of Tibet, and Aksai Chin. Similarly, the famous 10-row line around the South China Sea threatens all neighboring states: Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia and Taiwan. A map is an object of power and projection on the world. Can we believe that this will never go further and what would be the consequences of the alliance game in the event of a Chinese coup?

The 2023 edition of the standard map of China. © Twitter @globaltimesnews

Closer to home, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has been facing the rebellion of the March 23 Movement (M23) supported by Rwanda for two years according to several UN reports. In an interview given on Friday, March 29 to several media, the president of the DRC, Félix Tschisekedi, was questioned on the risk of a «declaration of war in Rwanda», alerting that the mission of Joao Lourenço, President of Angola and mediator appointed by the African Union, represented «the way of the last chance»!

What can humanitarians do?

Filippo Grandi, High Commissioner for Refugees of the United Nations launched «It is a indictment against the state of the world» when the figure of 110 million refugees and displaced was reached on June 14, 2023. To measure this figure, remember that they were 43.3 million in 2010, 60 million in 2015, 79.5 million in 2019! There is no reason for this figure to stop climbing, quite the contrary!

The risk is real to see the chisel effect of increasing humanitarian needs crossing the decrease in resources.

This is not already the case for the 17 million people in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger who need humanitarian assistance this year. In 2023, humanitarian appeals received only about a third of the necessary funds.

Despite the commitments made at the European Humanitarian Forum, on 18 and 19 March, in Brussels, despite the hope of seeing the European Union and the Member States confirm their commitment to humanitarian action, faced with the demobilization of other major actors, far from any wait-and-see, It is essential that humanitarian organizations mobilize to recall the responsibility to protect and the duty to provide humanitarian assistance.

Food distribution in Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo. © Photo PAM / Michael Castofas
Déplacement de population en RDC entre les villes de Goma et de Rutshuru. © Photo Moses Sawasawa / MSF

Ways and means are not lacking, not only to sanctuarize humanitarian budgets, but also to index their evolution on the level of the vital needs of populations in danger. These initiatives include:

  • Act with States and European and international organizations to raise awareness of the disastrous consequences that a possible chisel effect would have.
  • Mobilize public opinion to support this great humanitarian cause and to develop the generosity of individuals.
  • Accelerate all forms of innovation that reduce costs and increase aid effectiveness.
  • Optimize the double Humanitarian Nexus – development and encourage development agencies to support the most vulnerable in fragile or crisis countries.

Humanitarian aid is undoubtedly at a new historic turning point and it must once again ensure and demonstrate its ability to carry out its mission to save lives.

The humanitarian must say loud and clear that reducing humanitarian budgets is not to make virtuous savings, but on the contrary to multiply the risks of mortality, despair, radicalisation, of migratory movements which in turn will cause harmful effects from step to step like an epidemic. Without forgetting the essential, without solidarity, what will we be and what will happen?

 

Alain Boinet who thanks you for your support (MakeaDonation).

Alain Boinet is the president of Défis Humanitaires, an association that publishes the online journal http://www.defishumanitaires.com. He is the founder of the humanitarian association Solidarités International, of which he was Managing Director for 35 years. In addition, he is a member of the Humanitarian Concertation Group at the Crisis and Support Centre of the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs, member of the Board of Directors of Solidarités International, the French Water Partnership (PFE), Fondation Véolia, Think Tank (re)sources. He continues to visit the field (North-East Syria, Nagorno-Karabakh/Artsakh and Armenia) and to testify in the media.

 

In this edition, you will find the following articles: