Armenia at a Crossroads in Its Destiny

May and June 2026: two months that cement Armenia’s ties with the European Union

© The Smithsonian for Folklife and Cultural Heritage – Crowd of protesters in the Place of Republic in Yerevan, during the Velvet Revolution in 2018

An analysis. With this article by Arthur Robert, we offer a detailed look at the recent diplomatic events of early May with France and the European Union, Russian reactions, and the June 7 legislative elections won by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

In May 2026, within a forty-eight-hour window, Yerevan hosted the 8th summit of the European Political Community (EPC), inaugurated the first-ever bilateral EU-Armenia summit, signed a strategic partnership with France, and concluded a connectivity partnership with the European Commission.

The sequence of May 4–5, 2026 was both the culmination of an Armenian repositioning begun in 2018 and a strong political signal, one month ahead of the June 7 legislative elections in which the country’s positioning toward Europe and Russia was a central theme. This sequence allowed Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to reinforce the geostrategic shift he had initiated, consisting of moving away from Russia’s orbit and deepening relations with the EU.

For Brussels and Paris, the stake was to consolidate a foothold in the Caucasus, at a time when Georgia is drifting away and Russia is militarily absorbed by Ukraine. Kaja Kallas, Vice-President of the European Commission and High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, recalled during the summit that “Armenia would decide for itself.”

Thus, the victory of Nikol Pashinyan’s Civil Contract party in the June 7, 2026 legislative elections sealed the rapprochement between Armenia and the European Union. Civil Contract won with nearly 50% of the vote, while the parties favoring closer ties with Russia — Armenia Strong, led by Samvel Karapetyan, and the Armenia Alliance, led by Robert Kocharyan — obtained 23% and 10% of the vote, respectively. While the outgoing Prime Minister’s party, in power since 2018, retained an absolute majority, it lost seven seats compared to the 2021 legislative elections, depriving it of the two-thirds majority that would have allowed it to pursue the constitutional revision demanded by Azerbaijan.

© Department of Foreign Affairs and International Development, Archives Direction (geographic division) – November 2014

 

The European Political Community (EPC) Summit: a symbolically charged first outside the EU

The 8th EPC summit, the first held outside the EU, brought together on May 4, 2026 in Yerevan more than forty heads of state and government, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, under the motto “Building the Future: Unity and Stability in Europe.” Four major themes emerged from the summit:

  • Democratic resilience, with the idea that Armenian democracy must be protected from “external interference and disinformation,” a direct consequence of Russian hybrid warfare;
  • Trans-Caucasian and trans-Caspian connectivity, in the current context of the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) and the Middle Corridor, of which Armenia now aspires to be a branch via the future TRIPP route;
  • Economic and energy security, with reduced dependence on fossil fuels and the rise of renewables and nuclear power;
  • Defense and strategic autonomy, driven by the Ukrainian context.
© Alain Boinet – City of Meghri, in the district of Syunik, South of Armenia near borders with Iran, Azerbaidjan and Nakhitchevan. It’s the spot within the Latchin corridor through which should go the TRIPP road and a railway.

The choice of Yerevan for this first EPC summit outside the EU marks political recognition of Armenia’s trajectory, begun in 2017 with the signing of a Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the EU and Armenia, which entered into force in 2021. After the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023, Yerevan’s pivot westward continued with the announcement in April 2024 of an EU Resilience and Growth Plan for Armenia, endowed with €270 million over the 2024–2027 period.

 

The first EU-Armenia summit: a further step toward accession

On May 5, 2026, following the EPC, António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, co-chaired with Nikol Pashinyan the first bilateral EU-Armenia summit, marked by the signing of a joint declaration reaffirming the EU’s commitment “to supporting Armenia’s sovereignty, resilience and reform agenda,” with both parties committing to “expand their long-term strategic cooperation.”

Armenia’s path continued with the adoption of the law “On Launching the Process of Armenia’s Accession to the EU” by the National Assembly in March 2025, which makes EU candidacy a legally binding orientation for the Armenian executive. Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan indicated in October 2025 that a formal application could be submitted the following year. Subsequently, a strategic agenda for the EU-Armenia partnership was adopted in December 2025.

© Armenian governement gallery – Opening ceremony of the EPC in May 2026

Two partnerships were sealed during the summit:

  • The EU-Armenia Connectivity Partnership, covering energy, transport and digital sectors;
  • The allocation of €30 million under the European Peace Facility (EPF) for Armenia’s armed forces. This amount combines a first tranche of €10 million (signed in 2024) and a second of €20 million adopted in January 2026.

 

The France-Armenia strategic partnership: a “singular relationship” institutionalized

French President Emmanuel Macron played a key role in this sequence, which cemented the strength of the France-Armenia friendship, just as the French Senate and National Assembly played a driving role in the maturation of this partnership, through:

  • The activism of the France-Armenia friendship group;
  • The Senate resolution of November 25, 2020 on the “need to recognize the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh”;
  • The Senate resolution of November 15, 2023 condemning Azerbaijan and calling for European sanctions.

Welcomed by large crowds expressing sympathy in the streets of the capital, Emmanuel Macron spoke of a “singular relationship” and Armenia’s “European vocation,” and signed with Nikol Pashinyan the declaration on the French-Armenian strategic partnership, complemented by a series of contracts carried out by French companies.

© Armenian government – Signing of France-Armenia agreemets on May the 5th 2026

In the field of defense, the partnership establishes Paris as one of Armenia’s main arms suppliers and extends cooperation begun in 2023, including:

  • Continuation of orders signed in October 2023: three Thales GM200 radars, 50 Arquus Bastion armored vehicles, as well as a letter of intent for MBDA Mistral surface-to-air missiles;
  • Continuation of deliveries of the 36 CAESAR howitzers ordered in June 2024. The first units were presented in Armenia in May 2026 ahead of the May 28 military parade.

In the economic field, Vinci and Razel-Bec signed a declaration of intent to participate in the construction of the Bargushat tunnel, a key piece of infrastructure for connecting with the Georgian port of Poti and the south of the country. In civil nuclear power, France (Framatome) positioned itself among other competitors for the construction of the future small modular reactor (SMR) intended to replace Metsamor. In the aerospace sector, FlyOne Armenia ordered two Airbus A321neo aircraft, while Armenia’s Ministry of Defense acquired six Airbus H145 military helicopters.

© Olivier Decottignies – Signing of defense agreements on the 22nd and 23rd of February 2024 in Yerevan between defense ministers Sébastien Lecornu and Souren Papikian

 

Armenia’s geopolitical repositioning as a central issue in the legislative elections

As the timing of the EU-Armenia summit illustrates, the rapprochement with Europe, along with the exit from Russia’s orbit, were central themes of Armenia’s June 2026 legislative elections.

Civil Contract took a position breaking with the historic relationship of vassalage between Armenia and Russia — a classic feature of the relationship Russia seeks with former Soviet states, according to political scientist Taline Papazian. The Prime Minister championed a doctrine of “real Armenia,” consisting of refocusing the state on its internationally recognized borders and renouncing any claim to Nagorno-Karabakh, and promised the adoption of a new Constitution presented as a “Fourth Republic.”

This campaign took place against a backdrop of tensions with the religious establishment, since since June 2025 Nikol Pashinyan has publicly called for the departure of Catholicos Karekin II, head of the Armenian Apostolic Church, whom he accuses of having broken his vow of celibacy. In February 2026, the Armenian prosecutor’s office launched proceedings against the Catholicos.

The confrontation with the Church became a central dividing line with the opposition, which largely positioned itself as the defender of the clergy. It is in this context that Samvel Karapetyan, a Russian-Armenian billionaire and founder of the “Armenia Strong” alliance (23% in the June 2026 elections), entered politics. In June 2025 he had pledged to “defend” the Church, before being arrested for “calling for the seizure of power” and placed under house arrest. Ineligible due to his Russian and Cypriot citizenship, he handed leadership of the party list to his nephew Narek Karapetyan, who is himself under investigation for concealing Russian citizenship. The alliance promised to revise the Constitution to allow Samvel Karapetyan to become Prime Minister. Documents published by the investigative outlet The Insider allege past ties between him and Russia’s FSB, which his camp has denied, calling it a fabrication.

© Wikimedia Commons – A CSTO Summit in Yntymak Ordo Residence , Bishkek, in November 2025

The other opposition forces shared this pro-Russian orientation while differing in profile and degree. The “Armenia Alliance” (10% in the June 2026 elections), led by former President Robert Kocharyan, advocated for remaining in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the CSTO (Collective Security Treaty Organization — a military alliance created and led by Moscow in 2002, grouping six former Soviet republics). The “Armenia Alliance” also seeks closer ties with Moscow and rejects any constitutional concession to Azerbaijan, which part of the opposition views as a betrayal.

Judicial affairs fueled the polarization among the protagonists. In addition to Samvel Karapetyan, Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, leader of the 2024 protest movement against territorial concessions to Azerbaijan, remained in pre-trial detention over an alleged coup plot. Armenia’s Investigative Committee reported 59 criminal cases for electoral fraud, mainly targeting people close to the opposition. Those concerned see this as judicial instrumentalization against their candidates, while the government invokes the rule of law and the fight against foreign interference.

The geopolitical divisions of the Armenian election were accompanied by a large-scale Russian interference operation reportedly involving Russia’s three main intelligence services (the SVR, FSB and GRU). This operation took the form of a disinformation campaign using methods well known to European authorities, such as Doppelganger or Storm-1516. The campaign notably aimed to tarnish the reputation of Nikol Pashinyan, code-named “Boroda” (meaning “beard”), and was reportedly accompanied by efforts by Russian services to gather information that could compromise Pashinyan. Finally, Russia is said to have devised a plan to transfer 100,000 Armenians from Russia in order to influence the vote, in addition to its support for the “Armenia Strong” alliance.

 

A minor regional revolution that challenges Russia

The months of May and June 2026 brought Armenia’s estrangement from Russia, begun in 2018, to its peak. Abandoned by its historic partner during the two successive phases of conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh (or Artsakh) with Azerbaijan (2021–2022 and 2023), Armenia has frozen its participation in the CSTO since February 2024. Following an agreement, Russia withdrew its border guards from Yerevan airport in July 2024, where they had been stationed since 1992. Nikol Pashinyan spoke of a “point of no return” in December 2024, and in March 2025 Yerevan notified Moscow of its refusal to fund the CSTO’s 2024 budget.

© Wikimedia Commons – Vladimir Putin with Armenian Prime minister Nikol Pachinian in Kremlin (April 2026)

Russia reacted strongly to Armenia’s distancing from the CSTO, and reacted even more forcefully to the May-June 2026 sequence, viewing Volodymyr Zelensky’s participation in the EU summit in Yerevan in particular as a betrayal.

The day after the European summits in Yerevan, Russian diplomacy denounced a “rapprochement” with Brussels intended, according to Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, to draw Armenia into an “irreversible involvement in the EU’s anti-Russian line.” Meeting at the EAEU summit in Astana on May 28, 2026, the Moscow-led bloc deemed that Armenia’s EU candidacy posed “serious risks” to its economic security, and mandated a review of a possible suspension of Armenia by December.

Armenia was also subjected to a series of economic restrictions by Russia, its main economic partner (around 37% of Armenian exports go to Russia, while nearly 30% of imports come from there). Most of these restrictions were justified by Russia on sanitary grounds, but their timing leaves little doubt as to Russia’s intent to punish Armenia for its geopolitical trajectory.

As early as April 2026, Russia banned the Armenian cognac brand Proshyan on its territory, a week after a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Nikol Pashinyan. On May 29, Vladimir Putin compared Yerevan’s trajectory to the “Ukrainian scenario” and brandished the trade weapon, stating that Russia would be “forced to limit its economic activities in Armenia” if the country moved closer to the EU. The following day, Moscow recalled its ambassador to Armenia for “consultations on measures taken” against Armenia over its “rapprochement with the European Union, undermining cooperation within the EAEU.”

As the elections approached, these restrictions intensified. On May 22, the Russian agency Rosselkhoznadzor (responsible for veterinary and sanitary surveillance and control of goods entering Russia) temporarily restricted imports of floral products from Armenia. For similar reasons, Russia blocked tens of millions of bottles of Jermuk mineral water — a popular Armenian brand in Russia — at the end of May.

© Armenian government – Armenian Prime minister arménien, Nikol Pachinian, voting during the June 2026 elections

Starting May 30, 2026, Rosselkhoznadzor also imposed “temporary restrictions” on imports of tomatoes, cucumbers, peppers and strawberries from Armenia. On June 2, these restrictions were extended to several fruits, and on June 3 to Armenian eggplants, potatoes, and dried fruits. Finally, on June 12, Russia blocked the import of all quarantine-subject products from Armenia, as well as their transit through its territory to member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).

On June 15, Kaja Kallas indicated that the EU was preparing a large-scale economic aid plan for Armenia to help it cope with Russian retaliatory measures.

 

An unprecedented partnership in the Caucasus

The French and EU-Armenian partnerships could, in the medium term, become the prototype for a European security policy in the eastern neighborhood.

Georgia’s trajectory offers, by contrast, a counter-example of a failed shift. After obtaining EU candidate status in December 2023, Georgia abruptly backtracked under the effect of its domestic politics. As early as May 2024, the pro-Russian Georgian Dream party pushed through a “foreign agents” law modeled on the Russian one, deemed by Brussels incompatible with democratic standards. The October 2024 legislative elections, won by Georgian Dream in a vote marred by irregularities, sealed the rupture. In November 2024, just hours after the European Parliament adopted a resolution rejecting the election results due to irregularities, Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze announced the suspension of EU accession negotiations until the end of 2028, accusing the EU of blackmail. Moreover, deliveries to Armenia were interrupted: of the 50 Bastion armored vehicles promised by France, only 26 had been delivered, due to transit difficulties through Georgia since the end of 2024.

 

Despite recent progress, a situation that remains fragile

While Armenia in June 2026 no longer appears to be a “disappointed ally” of Moscow but rather a distinct strategic partner with robust ties to Europe, the new Armenian situation remains fragile.

First, while normalization between Azerbaijan and Armenia appears to be continuing, its longevity cannot be predicted. The tripartite protocol of August 2025, signed in the presence of Donald Trump, Pashinyan, and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, creates unprecedented conditions for peace. But Baku is conditioning the formal signing of the treaty on the revision of the Armenian Constitution to remove all reference to Nagorno-Karabakh, which could reignite tensions in a context of clear Azerbaijani military superiority. Yet neither the EU nor France is in a position to provide Armenia with security guarantees comparable to those long offered by Russia, which still maintains a base in the country housing 4,000 soldiers.

© The White House – Donald Trump, Nikol Pachinian and Ilham Aliev in Washington on the 8th of August 2025 during the signing of the TRIPP (Trump Route Initiative for International Peace and Prosperity)

Second, Russia’s economic and political retaliatory measures are expected to have a significant impact on the Armenian economy.

Finally, the June 2026 legislative elections showed that parties advocating closer ties with Russia remain very popular. In the long term, Armenia’s deep historical ties with Russia and the reality of its geographic position will likely compel Armenia to normalize its relations with Russia.

As Taline Papazian sums it up, Armenia faces the complex challenge of “transforming an imposed rupture into a coherent political project, capable of reconciling sovereignty, democratic stability, and openness to its regional and European environment.”

Arthur Robert.


Arthur Robert is an analyst within the sectors of geopolitics and economy. He works for public institutions as well as the private sector while being a teaching assistant.


Discover other articles from this edition :

Storm warning

“A Storm on a Mediterranean Coast” by Claude-Joseph Vernet (1767), Getty Center in Los Angeles

Previously, it was said that foreign policy had no place and influence on elections, that it was not a criterion for voters’ choice among candidates. Today, the trend seems to be reversing when public opinion perceives that external events, near or far, can have a negative impact on their daily lives, on their own security.

The war in Ukraine, the war in the Middle East around the Strait of Hormuz and their consequences on the supply of oil, gas, fertilizers, cereals, food products, value chains produce immediate concrete consequences on the growth rate, inflation, deficit, and the need to strengthen our security after decades of disarmament of the famous “peace dividends.”

In a masterful documentary (documentary available in the right column of the website through ARTE), Jean-François Colosimo shows, with images and statements, how “The Empires Strike Back” (Russia, China, Iran, India, United States) extend their power, if necessary at the expense of their neighbors.  \nDuring the next presidential elections in France, in April 2027, will the international situation and foreign policy have an influence on voters’ political choices? Will humanitarian and development aid be present and convincing in the debates?

In this edition, we address this question whose relevance imposes itself on us between external threats, consequences and internal weaknesses, international solidarity.

In his article”How the vases break,” Cyprien Fabre highlights the fault lines that weaken us and a “resilience crisis that we all must now face,” calling to “build this resistance to shocks.”

In his opinion piece, Antoine Vaccaro warns us about the strong rise of “autocratic regimes,” the weakening of freedom and law, and calls for help, with Seneca and Marcel Mauss, the philanthropy of giving as an antiviral for a resistant and dynamic society.

While external threats can weaken the resilience capacities of a country and its population, as well as those of the European Union, our internal weaknesses are the best allies of those who consider us their “enemy.” The very existence of Ukraine ultimately depends only on its resistance.

© Alain Boinet – Maidan square in Kyiv, in front of flags and pictures of Ukrainian soldiers who died in combat

Let us remember the lesson of historian Arnold Toynbee: “Societies do not die by murder, but by suicide.”

It is time to take stock of our strengths and internal weaknesses and to assess the external risks posed to us by Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and many other autocrats and dangers such as climate change, conflicts, uncontrolled population displacements worldwide, the grip of drug trafficking, terrorism, not to mention selfishness and frenzied consumerism.

We are living in a strange time, a moment of transition to something we do not yet know.Which anthropologist will be able to interpret the simultaneous release in France of films like “Les Rayons et les Ombres” by Xavier Giannoli about collaboration during the occupation from 1940 to 1944, but also Antonin Baudry’s two-part film “De Gaulle,” The Iron Age then I Write Your Name, and in October, the film by László Nems “Moulin”.

What will be the impact of these films and General de Gaulle on public opinion, and on the candidates themselves for the upcoming presidential election?

“The French Archipelago” or the “birth of a multiple and divided nation,” a remarkable study-book by Jérôme Fourquet, calls us more than ever to lucidity and unity.

So, what could be more symbolic in this troubled context than the entry of Marc Bloch into the Pantheon on June 23, 2026.

Marc Bloch dressed as an officer when he was fighting with an infantry regiment in 1914 – 1018 (non-dated photo)

Marc Bloch, a graduate of the École Normale Supérieure, agrégé, historian, fought in the 1914-1918 war and then in the 1939-1945 war. In 1929, he created with Lucien Lefebvre the journal Annales d’histoire économique et sociale. In 1939, then over 50 years old and father of 6 children, he asked to return to service. After the defeat, he wrote the May 1940 report “The Strange Defeat,” a book to read and reread to understand. Jewish and French patriot, he then joined the resistance. He was arrested in Lyon on March 8, 1944, tortured by Klaus Barbieand summarily executed on June 16, 1944, along with about thirty other prisoners, a martyr of the French resistance.

My intention is not to say that history repeats itself because, as the philosopher says, “One does not bathe twice in the same river.” However, why does this past come back so strongly today in our collective memory and what lessons will we draw from it for the present times?

If we will not rewrite history, on the other hand, we need men and women of the caliber, courage, and intelligence of a Marc Bloch, a Jean Moulin, and the vision of a General de Gaulle. What applies to us applies to everyone everywhere. The countries of the world, members of the UN, must reposition themselves on the global chessboard that is unstable.

© Thueras – Statue of Athena the defender, Academy of Athens

The lessons are many and diverse. Faced with aggression and totalitarianism, fighting from the start is the best way to prevent submission. If, as Churchill said, “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others,” that should not exempt it from hearing just criticisms and reforming itself in times of crisis. Its legitimacy depends on this. For we are weak because of our own weaknesses and divisions. There is no fatality; it depends first and foremost on us.

If philanthropy and humanitarian aid are not the solution to all its immense challenges, they constitute an essential condition for living together in the diversity of nation-states, alliances, identities in mutual respect and solidarity.

Alain Boinet.


Discover other articles from this edition :


Alain Boinet is the president of the association Défis Humanitaires which publishes the online review www.defishumanitaires.com. He is the founder of the humanitarian association Solidarités International of which he was director general for 35 years. Moreover, he is a member of the Humanitarian Consultation Group with the Crisis and Support Center of the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, member of the Board of Directors of Solidarités International, of the French Water Partnership (PFE), of the Véolia Foundation, of the Think Tank (re)sources. He continues to go to the field (north-east Syria, Haut-Karabagh/Artsakh and Armenia) and to testify in the media.