Armenia: Exclusive interview with Olivier Decottignies

French Ambassador

Alain Boinet: Mr. Ambassador, thank you for answering our questions for the online magazine Défis Humanitaires. You are the French ambassador to Yerevan in Armenia. My first question concerns Missak and Mélinée Manouchian, who were inducted into the Panthéon on February 21. It’s a powerful symbol, saluting the memory of a Resistance fighter who fought with his comrades for our country during the war, and who paid for it with their lives. What is the significance of this event?

Olivier Decottignies : Thank you very much. This is first and foremost a French event, a republican event, a national commemoration. But it is also a Franco-Armenian event insofar as the leader of this group of foreign resistance fighters, who are honored at the Panthéon, was an Armenian. Missak Manouchian was a survivor of the 1915 genocide, who spent his childhood in the orphanages of Lebanon, before arriving in France as an adult. He was a multi-faceted personality: Armenian, communist activist, volunteer in Armenian charities, resistance fighter, poet, worker. Through him and his wife Mélinée, who was also a member of his network and lies beside him in the Panthéon, the entire Manouchian group is honored. A group that included more than just Armenians – it included Italians, Hungarians, Poles, Spaniards… Many of them were Jews. The contribution to the Resistance of all these foreigners who died for France is now recognized.

Alain Boinet: At the end of January, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pachinian proposed that Azerbaijan sign a non-aggression pact in anticipation of a comprehensive peace treaty. On February 13, 4 Armenian soldiers were killed by Azeri fire in Syunik province. President Ilham Aliyev regularly makes bellicose statements. How can we understand this attitude, and what can be done to preserve peace in the South Caucasus?

Olivier Decottignies: The situation between Armenia and Azerbaijan is still one of armed conflict, since we’re talking about negotiating a peace treaty. This conflict regularly gives rise to incidents along the military contact lines. Moreover, these contact lines do not always correspond to the actual border line, since Azerbaijan has been occupying whole swathes of Armenia’s sovereign territory militarily since its offensives in May 2021 and September 2022. Negotiations have been initiated in various formats. These negotiations are no longer making substantial progress, which explains the concerns not only of the Armenian authorities and France, but of all those working for peace. The statements by President Aliyev to which you refer obviously contribute to this concern.

City of Meghri, Syunik province, southern Armenia, bordering Iran, Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan. © Alain Boinet

Alain Boinet: One of the reasons put forward by Azerbaijan is the passage between its territory, to the east, and Nakhchivan, to the west, which is Azeri and separated to some extent by Armenia and its province of Syunik. For the Armenians, what is the solution for allowing passage between these two parts of Azerbaijan? And why isn’t this happening?

Olivier Decottignies: The proposal that the Armenians are making, not only to Azerbaijan but to all the states in the region, is to find a traffic regime, which the Armenians have christened “peace crossroads.” This initiative was launched last October by the Prime Minister of Armenia, from Georgia. It does not only concern Azerbaijan and Armenia, but aims to integrate all neighboring states, by facilitating movement in the region under certain conditions: freedom, reciprocity, equality of these states and respect for their sovereignty. It’s a formula that has the merit of uniting all the states in the region around common interests and clear principles. This formula has the support of France.

Alain Boinet: So, why isn’t this being done?

Olivier Decottignies: There are several aspects to the discussions. One of them, which is essential if you want to make peace with your neighbor, is to determine where one country begins and the other ends. The delimitation of the border has not been agreed between the two states, not only on the route, but also on the method, and in particular on the references that would be used. The key principle is that of the Alma-Ata declaration, which stipulates that the borders of the states that have emerged from the Soviet Union correspond to the administrative boundaries of the former Soviet republics. This principle is binding on both Armenia and Azerbaijan, and was reiterated by both states in Prague in October 2022, thanks to the mediation of President Emmanuel Macron. Then, in order to proceed with the route, we need a reference frame. This reference frame is provided by Soviet-era maps. Today, there is no complete agreement between the parties on which set of maps should be used.

Alain Boinet: Does Armenia agree with this set of maps? With the borders as they were defined at the time?

Olivier Decottignies: Armenia adheres to the Alma-Ata principles. But these principles don’t just apply to Armenia, they also apply to Azerbaijan and to all the post-Soviet states that signed up to this rule when the Soviet Union broke up. We’re talking about a time when administrative boundaries existed, but had no more physical manifestation than the boundaries between French departments or regions.

Alain Boinet: Armenia’s neighbors are Russia, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Iran and Georgia. What is the attitude of these countries to the situation in the South Caucasus, to the tension you just mentioned? What is their position with regard to Armenia? What can more distant countries like France, the member states and the European Union, India, Greece, the United States and India, which are also concerned by the issues at stake in this region, do?

Olivier Decottignies: It’s difficult for me to speak on behalf of these countries, which I don’t represent. On the other hand, I have a regular dialogue with the Armenian authorities and I can try to explain the situation they are in.

Armenia has noted on several occasions, in particular in May 2021 and September 2022, that the security guarantee historically provided by Russia, and which in principle commits Russia within the framework of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), had not been forthcoming. It also realized in 2023 that the Russian peacekeepers who had been deployed in Nagorno-Karabakh as part of the Russian-brokered ceasefire agreement of 2020 had been left holding the bag when the Azerbaijani offensive against Nagorno-Karabakh began.

In fact, the Russian soldiers only left their barracks when it came to disarming the Nagorno-Karabakh forces, as provided for in the ceasefire agreement between the de facto authorities and the Azerbaijani government. So there was an Azerbaijani offensive against Nagorno-Karabakh, carried out with the support of Turkey, but also with the complicity of Russia, and which resulted in the mass forced departure of almost all the Armenians from this territory – over 100,000 people – who have taken refuge in Armenia.

Defense agreements signed on February 22 and 23 in Yerevan by defense ministers Sébastien Lecornu and Souren Papikian. © Olivier DecottigniesArmenia is therefore seeking to diversify its security partnerships. To this end, it is turning to more distant countries such as France, with which we are developing a defense relationship in terms of equipment, training and consulting. And France, in choosing this defense relationship with Armenia, has broken a taboo, since it is the first NATO country to supply defense equipment to Armenia, which remains a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization. In the same spirit, Armenians are also turning to India. And after the French Minister of the Armed Forces on February 23, the Greek Minister of Defense visited Armenia on March 4.

On another note, we shouldn’t forget Iran, which is an important neighbor for Armenia, insofar as Teheran has reaffirmed, on numerous occasions, its concern that the Armenian-Iranian border to the south of Armenia should not be controlled by any state other than Armenia.

Alain Boinet: French President Emmanuel Macron recently declared that France has a friendly relationship with Armenia. Observers understood that this was an evolution, the affirmation of a special relationship. Can you tell us more?

Olivier Decottignies: The closeness is not new, it’s the result of a long shared history, between the two states, but also between the two peoples. Today, there is above all a very clear line, which is that of the President of the Republic: France’s support for Armenia is unconditional, wholehearted and constant. This is the line that my team in Yerevan, under the authority of the Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs, and with the support of all the government departments concerned, are implementing.

Alain Boinet: Doesn’t this create obligations in the current situation?

Olivier Decottignies: France’s position is not declaratory: it is translated into action. In the humanitarian sphere, France has responded to the massive exile of 100,000 Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh with humanitarian aid that has been increased to 29 million euros for 2023, i.e. more than any other bilateral donor. France was the first to send emergency medical aid to Armenia, the first to evacuate severely wounded and burn victims from Nagorno-Karabakh to French hospitals. France was also at the forefront politically. On three occasions, it referred the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh to the Security Council. At European level, it has pushed for measures that were adopted by the Foreign Affairs Council last November: on the one hand, the reinforcement of the European observation mission, whose numbers will double; and on the other, the opening of discussions to give Armenia access to the European Peace Facility. Last but not least, France has been there for Armenia on a bilateral level, including, as has been said, in terms of defense relations.

The ambassador with a French military delegation in Armenia. © Olivier Decottignies

Alain Boinet: In this tense situation, where things could get out of hand, as Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pachinian recently mentioned on Armenian television, what can we expect from the European Union, but also from the United Nations and other countries, in order to avoid the risk of a potential conflict?

Olivier Decottignies: All member states of the United Nations are, in principle, committed to respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other members. So that’s what we’re entitled to expect from any state. Of course, the member states of the Security Council, of which France is a member, have special responsibilities.

Armenia wishes to draw closer to the European Union. As Prime Minister Nikol Pachinian told the European Parliament on October 17, Armenia is ready to develop its relationship with the European Union as far as the EU is prepared to go. Armenia welcomed the prospect of EU membership opened up to Georgia a few weeks ago. It also held a cooperation council with the European Union.

The European Union observer mission is a very good example of what the European Union can do effectively and concretely. Having been out in the field on patrol with the mission, I’ve been able to observe that European observers are warmly welcomed, that they are greeted in a friendly manner in the villages and on the roadsides, that their presence reassures. They are proof, for these vulnerable and isolated populations living in military contact zones, that they are not forgotten by the world. In addition to this reassuring role, the presence of this observation mission means that the international community can obtain impartial information, which is essential in a crisis of this nature. It helps to dispel the fog of war.

Alain Boinet: Is it conceivable that, in the current context, this mission could be mobilized more specifically in the Syunik region, which seems particularly threatened?

Olivier Decottignies: The mission’s mandate covers the whole of Armenia. So it can go anywhere. Its patrols focus primarily on border areas and military contact zones. The mission’s aim is to have sufficient manpower to increase the number of patrols, and Syunik is obviously one of the priority areas in this context.

Alain Boinet: Do you think that the current fragmentation of the world, as illustrated by the war in Ukraine, the Sahel or the Taiwan Strait, is a favorable moment that Azerbaijan could exploit by attempting a military coup against Armenia, a member of the international community represented at the United Nations?

Olivier Decottignies: I don’t know what the intentions of the Azerbaijani authorities are, and I have no contact with them. But what I do know is that in this fragmented, degraded international environment you describe, there have been several military episodes in recent years involving Azerbaijan and Armenia, or Azerbaijan and the Nagorno-Karabakh region, and that each time, Azerbaijan has taken the initiative.

Olivier Decottignies at a meeting on humanitarian aid for Armenia with members of the Crisis and Support Center of the French Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs. © Olivier Decottignies

Alain Boinet : On September 19 and 20, a military offensive by Azerbaijan drove 100,000 Armenians from their ancestral territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, or Artsakh, in Azerbaijan. How were they received in Armenia? What is their current situation? And how is France helping these refugees?

Olivier Decottignies: 100,000 people forced to leave their homes in less than a week is no mean feat. Given the scale of this population movement, the Armenian response, with the support of the international community and France in particular, has been satisfactory. In particular, no refugee camps have sprung up. Shelter solutions were found in the homes of private volunteers and relatives, as well as in hotels, gymnasiums and schools requisitioned by the state. The immediate response was, I think, equal to the challenge. The surge of solidarity was very strong in Armenia, and the international community was there to help. France played a key role in this response, as we were the leading bilateral donor of humanitarian aid to Armenia, with 29 million euros in 2023, thanks to the mobilization of the Government and Parliament.

Now that the emergency phase is over, the question arises of integrating the refugees. Integration raises legal issues, such as the choice of whether or not to opt for Armenian nationality. It also implies responding to very concrete challenges, which we stand by Armenia:

  • The question of housing, i.e. not just transitional accommodation, but sustainable housing;
  • The question of employment, with a labor market structure that was quite different in Nagorno-Karabakh from that in Armenia, with a much greater weighting of the public sector and the agricultural sector;
  • The question of education: of the 100,000 refugees, some 23,000 school-age children have been integrated into the Armenian school system, but all this has a cost and requires support;
  • Finally, a question that is far from secondary is that of psychosocial support. We’re talking about a population traumatized by nine months of blockade, a brutal military offensive and a forced exodus. It’s a multi-traumatized population, because for many, this is not their first experience of forced displacement. Some were driven out in the late 1980s and early 1990s by anti-Armenian pogroms in Azerbaijan. And for every Armenian, whether from Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia or the diaspora, there is the memory of the genocide, whether we like it or not. It’s a trauma that rekindles other traumas, and requires appropriate psychosocial support. This is one of the priorities of our humanitarian cooperation with Armenia, now and in the months to come.

Alain Boinet: In France, humanitarian and development aid, apart from the Crisis and Support Center of the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs and the French Development Agency, is essentially provided by associations, foundations and local authorities. What can these players do in Armenia today for those who are not yet present, and what do you suggest?

Olivier Decottignies: These players are already doing a great deal. Armenia is a land of decentralized cooperation. There isn’t a single region in Armenia that hasn’t established cooperation with French local authorities at municipal or governorate level. And on the French side, civil society organizations, diaspora organizations and NGOs are mobilized and present on the ground. Through the CDCS, we have supported Acted, Médecins du Monde and Action contre la Faim, who are hard at work in Armenia with their Armenian partners. Many diaspora organizations have been active in the country since independence, or even before, since the starting point for French humanitarian action in Armenia was the earthquake of December 7, 1988.

The priority for organizations wishing to help Armenia and Armenians is, of course, to support the refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh, in the four main areas we mentioned: housing, employment, education and psychosocial support.

At the same time, given Armenia’s current situation, we need to focus on the most strategic sectors and the regions most at risk. This means sectors that are crucial to Armenia’s territory, economy and resilience, as well as border regions close to military contact lines. From this point of view, there are no small issues and no small projects. A territory that holds together is one where the population stays, so there are jobs, services that can – and must – also be medical, educational and cultural services. I believe that today the most important thing is to concentrate where we can have the greatest impact, and to act not just with compassion, but strategically. We must always think of Armenia with the map in front of us.

Of course, all these organizations and initiatives know that they can get advice from the Embassy team: our door is always open to them.

Alain Boinet: How do you see Armenia’s future?

Olivier Decottignies: I see it looking towards Europe. This is the sense of the democratic trajectory that the Armenian people chose during the “velvet revolution” of 2018 and that they have maintained ever since, through all the trials and tribulations. From this point of view, Armenia’s recent accession to the International Criminal Court is also a very strong signal. However, turning towards Europe does not mean ignoring our regional environment. Building Armenia’s future requires reaching a peace agreement with Azerbaijan, but also, more broadly, a modus vivendi that enables all the states in the region to take full advantage of their strategic position at the crossroads of Europe, Asia and the Middle East. That’s why the resolution of this conflict is so important to us Europeans.

Alain Boinet: How would you like to conclude this interview?

Olivier Decottignies: I’d like to conclude by expressing my gratitude to all those who make up our relationship with Armenia and whom I meet in France and when they visit Armenia: the humanitarian community, civil society, the diaspora, local authorities, elected representatives and French administrations. They always welcome me with a lot of ideas, a lot of enthusiasm and a lot of commitment to developing this relationship with Armenia. I think it’s a great opportunity to benefit from this support, and there are few bilateral relations that arouse such support. From the bottom of my heart, thank you.

Alain Boinet: Thank you, Mr. Ambassador.

 

Visit the website of the French Embassy in Armenia

 

Olivier Decottignies

Olivier Decottignies is a career diplomat.

Former Consul General of France in Erbil, Kurdistan, Iraq (2019-2023), he worked from 2015 to 2016 as a researcher at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and from 2016 to, 2017 at the French Embassy in the United States. From 2012 to 2015, he was second counselor at the French Embassy in Iran, overseeing the nuclear portfolio and regional issues. Prior to that, he served at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Paris, where he worked on politico-military issues, in particular NATO and EU missions and operations in Libya, the Balkans and the Caucasus. He was deployed to Haiti as part of the first aid effort following the 2010 earthquake.

An alumnus of the École normale supérieure in Lyon, he holds a master’s degree in public affairs from Sciences Po Paris, a master’s degree in history from the École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS) and a bachelor’s degree in history from the Sorbonne.

Safe drinking water: what do global statistics tell us that goes beyond official reports?

© Gérard Payen

Since 2015, global statistics have sought to count the number of people whose human right to access safe drinking water is not being met. A new statistical indicator, access to safely managed water services (so-called SMWS access), includes parameters that reflect criteria of this human right, in particular the potability or contamination of water. Global statistics on access to drinking water finally measure access to truly safe water! After a few years of start-up, the WHO-UNICEF team that manages this indicator is now able to publish statistics every 2 years with sufficient country values to estimate a statistically meaningful global value.

The latest update is very recent. The report “Progress on household water, sanitation and hygiene, 2000-2022: Special focus on gender[i]” dates from July 2023. It provides and analyse national and global values at the end of 2022. The main findings of this report were presented by Camille Chambon in September 2023 in Défis Humanitaires[ii] n°80.

However, the statistical data updated to 2022 has also been published on the www.washdata.org website, which provides much more information. This effort at transparency is to be commended, as it makes it easier to understand how the various estimates are built. More, these data enable analyses that go further than what the WHO and UNICEF have published in their reports. That is the subject of this article: what do these new statistics tell us that goes beyond what has been published?

Tanker truck supplying an unconnected district in Delhi (photo C. Guillais) 

A WHO-UNICEF 2023 report that continues to focus on coverage rates

In March 2023, I wrote an article[iii] in Défis Humanitaires describing the United Nations’ persistent habit of reporting global statistics on access to safe drinking water while giving much space to details and analyses of progress in “coverage rates” and little space to “numbers of people without satisfactory access”. This rather technocratic attitude does not really respect the political objective of universal access and in some cases can lead to the concealment of regressions in relation to this objective. This habit is inconsistent with the global statistics on hunger, which are usually expressed in terms of the number of people suffering from hunger. No one is interested in the number or proportion of people who eat their fill!

The WHO-UNICEF 2023i report is no exception. For the SDG indicator, its summary page on access to safe drinking water provides 30 coverage rates and only one number of people without access! The latter, the 2.2 billion people without satisfactory access in 2022, has been widely publicised, but with no details and no information on its evolution over time, unlike the coverage rates. Furthermore, while the chapter on safe drinking water provides trends in rural and urban populations with access to safe drinking water, it gives neither the numbers nor the trends in rural and urban populations without satisfactory access.

However, this report makes significant progress in counting the number of people in different parts of the world without basic access to water. Let us hope that the next edition does the same for access to truly safe drinking water, a need that is three times greater.

With regard to the evolution of needs since 2015, the UN has published additional information in its 2023 annual report on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Methodological notes

Before going any further into the analysis of the 2022 statistics, I would like to draw readers’ attention to several points of statistical method.

Firstly, the 2000, 2015 or 2021 values published in 2023 should not be compared with the values published in 2021. This is because the 2023 statistical base uses recent data to recalculate all previous values. Changes over time can therefore only be analysed by using data from the 2023 database.

Secondly, the excellent statistical work of the WHO-UNICEF team is constrained by the fact that not all countries are able to provide national estimates. The global and regional estimates therefore contain extrapolations which are made rigorously but which create uncertainties.

The fact that the same limitations exist whatever the year means that more credibility can be given to variations over time than to the absolute values of the estimates. For example, the number of people in the world without access to safe drinking water is between 2 and 2.2 billion, after being estimated at 2.1 billion 3 years ago. The figures are not yet very accurate, as India and China are having difficulties in numbering people. But the 6% drop between 2015 and 2022 calculated under the same conditions is probably meaningful.

Progress on access to safe drinking water is slow

For several years now, the UN has been warning of the slow progress being made. The WHO-UNICEF 2023 report states that the pace of progress needs to be increased by a factor of 6 to achieve the target of universal access by 2030. Figure 1 below shows changes between 2015 and 2022 in the number of people without access to various essential services:

  • access to safe drinking water as defined by the SDGs, i.e. access to “safely-managed water services”;
  • “basic” access to drinking water, which does not guarantee the potability of water or the regularity of the water availability, but is nevertheless used for the SDG 1.4 target of access to essential services for poor or vulnerable people. It refers to access to “improved” sources requiring less than 30 minutes to obtain water;
  • access to basic sanitation, i.e. decent, healthy toilets that are not shared with neighbours. This indicator is close to that of the Millennium Development Goals (2000-2015), with the addition of the criterion of not sharing toilets. The SDG indicator for SDG target 6.2 is much more ambitious than basic sanitation as it also includes the need to clean up waste. As this indicator is therefore much more a measure of domestic effluent treatment rates than of people’s access to sanitation, it is not examined here;
  • access to electricity, an indicator of target SDG 7.1.

For each of these services, the rural component is drawn in light colour, while the urban component is drawn in dark colour.

Figure 1: World population without essential services (in billions) and trends between 2015 and 2022 (%)

This graph highlights several realities that are useful for assessing public policies:

  • Average progress in access to safe drinking water is very slow: needs have only fallen by 6% in 7 years, while at the same time needs for basic access to water have fallen by 19%, those for access to basic sanitation by 24% and those for access to electricity by more than 30%! In other words, policies on access to safe drinking water are far less effective than policies on access to sanitation and access to electricity. The populations lacking these services are ranked in the same order. 2.2 billion need safe drinking water, 1.5 billion need sanitation and only 0.7 billion need electricity. This suggests that, on average, governments give priority to electricity in their national priorities and devote far fewer financial resources to water than to electricity.
  • The light-coloured areas represent rural populations. Whether it is safe drinking water, sanitation, water or electricity, the number of rural dwellers lacking these services is decreasing faster than for the population as a whole.
  • The dark-coloured areas show the urban populations. We can see that access to essential services is progressing much more slowly in urban areas than in rural areas for electricity (-27% in 6 years) and access to basic sanitation (-14% in 7 years). For drinking water, the situation is catastrophic: the number of urban dwellers without basic access to water is stagnating, while the number of urban dwellers without safe drinking water (access to truly safe drinking water) has risen by 9% in 7 years!
  • As long as the number of urban dwellers without safe drinking water increases, it is mathematically impossible to achieve universal access to safe drinking water. The curve of safe drinking water needs in cities is almost a straight line. There has been no acceleration for years, despite warnings from UN-Water. The reality of the results of public policies diverges from the clear political objective of universal access to safe drinking water.
Water sold on a footpath in a Kenyan slum (Photo G. Payen)

Where are the 2.2 billion people without safe drinking water?

The WHO-UNICEF database provides coverage rates for safe drinking water services for most of the world’s major regions. Using these rates, it is easy to calculate the number of people in these regions who do not have access to safe drinking water. Figure 2 below shows these different populations with areas that are roughly in proportion. The figures for South Asia and East Asia are not very precise, as they have been calculated by extrapolation in the absence of estimates for India and China. For a mathematical reason not yet identified, the total number of people lacking safe drinking water in each region exceeds the figure of 2.2 billion calculated for the world as a whole. The values presented below are therefore not very precise, but their orders of magnitude and variations over time give food for thought.

Figure 2: Geographical distribution of people without access to safe drinking water (areas proportional to the estimated numbers of people calculated from the WHO-UNICEF regional database)

Figure 2 shows that there is a huge problem in sub-Saharan Africa, where 69% of the population does not have access to safe drinking water as defined by the global target.

Figure 3 below shows trends from 2015 to 2022 in the percentage of the population without access to safe drinking water in 2015. While the Asian regions appear to have made progress since 2015, with the number of people without access decreasing, the other major regions of the world are regressing, with an increase in needs. The greatest deterioration in speed and numbers is in sub-Saharan Africa, where the population without satisfactory access has increased by 90 million, or 13%, in 7 years.

Figure 3: 2015-2022 trends in estimates of the number of people lacking safe drinking water in the different regions of the world (calculations based on the WHO-UNICEF regional database).

Average progress masks worrying regressions

While the global estimate of the total number of people without access to safe drinking water decreases slightly between 2015 and 2022, this apparent progress conceals degradations in two major populations: sub-Saharan Africa and the urban half of the world’s population. In both cases, monitoring in terms of coverage rates suggests progress, from 27% to 31% for Africa, and from 80% to 81% for the urban population. But this modest progress in coverage rates is not enough to compensate for demographic growth on the African continent and urban growth in a very large number of countries. Figure 4 shows the number of people lacking access to safe drinking water in these two populations, and how this number has changed between 2015 and 2022. Here again, the numbers are not very precise because of the extrapolations used, but the variations over time are credible because they compare values calculated in 2015 and 2022 by using the same procedures.

Figure 4: Sub-Saharan and urban populations without satisfactory access to safe drinking water in 2015 and 2022 (in million) and variations 2015-2022 (in %) (values calculated from the WHO-UNICEF database).

These graphs show that although current efforts are leading to undeniable progress in coverage rates, this progress is insufficient in relation to population growth. As long as the number of people without safe drinking water is not reduced both in Africa and in cities, the target of universal access will be completely out of reach.

 

 

 

The International Water Association’s reference manual for the operational implementation of the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation

 

 

 

 

Factoring this statistical information into public policies

At the historic United Nations Water Conference in New York in March 2023, a global water crisis was acknowledged. UN-Water’s calls for accelerated action on water were reiterated, but no decisions for action were taken. In fact, since the adoption of the SDGs, there has been no discernible acceleration in global statistics on access to safe drinking water. It seems that most national policies are not seeking to achieve the target of universal access and are continuing on their previous path as if the SDG objectives did not exist.

At the SDG Summit in September 2023, the UN member states adopted a political resolution reaffirming their commitment to achieving universal access to energy, but failing to reiterate their targets for universal access to safe drinking water and sanitation, despite the much greater needs and their human rights status. Yet this declaration had been the subject of previous reports by the UN system, which mentioned the growing number of urban dwellers without access to safe drinking water. It was even in the title of the water paragraph of the UN 2023 report on the SDGs. But which government has seen this information that is never discussed or reported in the media? Does the mention of electricity and the omission of drinking water reflect differences in the influence of lobbies or differences in communication and visibility of needs? It should be noted that these reports also state that sub-Saharan Africa is “furthest behind”, but without mentioning any deterioration in access in these region.

One of the great merits of the 2030 Agenda and its SDGs is that they have made it possible to compile global statistics on major issues. Despite their imperfections, the resulting estimates are increasingly reliable. As far as access to safe drinking water is concerned, we now have much more relevant information than we had before 2015.

In particular, as shown above, those who take the time to analyse this new knowledge know that :

– Progress on access to safe drinking water is very slow on average, much slower than for electricity or basic sanitation.

– Universal access to safe drinking water is totally out of reach until the deterioration in access is halted in certain populations, particularly in cities and sub-Saharan Africa where almost two-thirds of the world population live.

But this new knowledge is not being studied, publicised or even discussed. There is an urgent need for the international community to consider it and trigger the necessary political upsurge that will lead to changes in public policies on drinking water and give water greater priority in government political programmes.

 

[i] https://washdata.org/report/jmp-2023-wash-households

[ii] UN drinking water: some progress, a lot of catching up to do! Summary of the UNICEF-WHO JMP Report (2020-2022), Camille Chambon, Defis Humanitaires n°80.

UN drinking water: some progress, a lot of catching up to do!


[iii] Access to drinking water : the major change in the global objective in 2015 comes up against stubborn technocratic habits, Gerard Payen, Defis Humanitaires, March 2023 https://defishumanitaires.com/en/2023/02/21/un-water-conference/

 

Gérard Payen

Gérard Payen has been working for over 35 years to solve water-related problems in all countries. As Water Adviser to the Secretary General of the United Nations (member of UNSGAB) from 2004 to 2015, he contributed to the recognition of the Human Rights to safe drinking water and sanitation, as well as to the adoption of the numerous water-related targets of the global Sustainable Development Goals. Today, he continues to work to mobilise the international community for better management of water-related problems, which requires more ambitious public policies. Vice-president of the French Water Partnership, he also advises the United Nations agencies that produce global water statistics. Impressed by the number of misconceptions about the nature of water-related problems, ideas that hamper public authorities in their decision-making, he published a book in 2013 to dismantle these preconceptions.