Expertise France, interview with Cassilde Brenière, Deputy Director General

https://www.afd.fr/fr/lac-victoria-eau-potable-accessible Workers are working at the Butimba water treatment station in Mwanza. AFD supported the construction and rehabilitation of water-related infrastructures, such as new water intakes and treatment control stations, in order to help the city of Mwanza meet the sanitation needs of its growing population. ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Hello Cassilde Brenière. We thank you for this interview for Défis Humanitaires. To begin, for our readers, could you present to us the action of Expertise France and your role.

Cassilde Brenière :

Thank you very much Alain, thank you for coming here to Expertise France and for taking an interest in our agency.

Expertise France is the French agency for international technical cooperation. For my part, I am Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the agency, in charge of operations.

Expertise France was created in 2015 through the merger of six operators previously housed within different ministries. This creation marked a desire for renewal of French technical cooperation. Since then, the agency has experienced significant growth, its turnover has multiplied by five and it is today the second largest European technical cooperation agency, with €570M in activity volume in 2025. We now count more than 2,500 collaborators including 1,700 in the field. It is this local anchoring which moreover constitutes our strength.

We are an interministerial governmental agency and, since 2022, a subsidiary of the French Development Agency (AFD). Our funding comes essentially from the European Union, from AFD and from French ministries.

Our hallmark rests on our capacity to mobilize, often in peer-to-peer approaches, French and European actors, local actors and to co-construct projects in support of public policies.

https://www.afd.fr/fr/actualites/exister-officiellement-sans-papiers-haiti Verification of administrative documents: an essential gesture to strengthen local governance and access to rights.

Alain Boinet – When one visits the Expertise France website, one realizes the very great diversity of your fields of expertise and intervention in the 4 corners of the world. Can you present your areas of action, your missions and your staff, your partnership policy both in the field and in terms of financing.

Cassilde Brenière :

We operate around six major technical domains, structured into departments.

The first is sustainable development where we work on climate, biodiversity, urban policies, circular economy, agriculture and agricultural value chains.

The second is governance notably financial governance stemming from the former agency ADETEF, which merged within Expertise France. We work on support to issues of structuring taxation, customs, the fight against corruption, budget management, or even the public expenditure chain. We also intervene on strengthening the consideration of human rights, gender, migration, justice and State reform.

The third domain is that of peace, stability and security. We are present in several crisis contexts such as in Syria, in Haiti, in Ethiopia, or even in Ukraine, where we intervene in a cross-cutting manner since 2016. I will come back to this.

The fourth domain, which is our primary field of action and also the most important in terms of project implementation, is health. L’Initiative, which we carry, aims to fight HIV, tuberculosis and malaria. This is a vast program financed by the French contribution to the Global Fund. But we also work to guarantee resilient and equitable health systems, notably by relying on the consideration of human resources in health.

The fifth domain concerns education, vocational training and social protection, with a French model often mobilized in exchanges of experience.

Finally, the sixth domain, which is growing strongly, corresponds to support for the private sector, the sustainable economy and the business environment, in order to promote private investments in partner countries.

On the geographical level, more than 50% of our activity is in Africa, but the specificity of our mandate allows us to intervene in all countries of the world, such as in Latin America, in Asia or in Europe, notably in Ukraine and in Greece.

To do so, we work with many partners: French public administrations (ministries, Court of Auditors..), hospitals, AP-HP, university hospitals, but also local and international civil society.

Alain Boinet – Among all your partners, there is notably civil society and national and international NGOs. How do you cooperate concretely with these actors and what is the specific added value of this sector.

Cassilde Brenière :

Civil society is a major partner of Expertise France. Last year, around 100 million euros were mobilized in direct funding from French civil society but above all from local civil society.

We work, directly, with many associations; for example on the PAGOF program (Partnership for an Open Government) in several West African countries, in Morocco, in Senegal, in Côte d’Ivoire and in Tunisia. The aim is to strengthen public transparency and access to data, by working both with States and with members of civil society. We also mobilize CFI (Canal France International) to strengthen journalists, fact-checking and the role of civil society as a bulwark.

Another example: the European program Africa-Europe Youth Academy (AEYA), which aims to strengthen youth leadership in 18 African countries. We fund associations, and collaborate with universities and schools to develop the skills and leadership of youth through training, mentoring, and spaces for dialogue, with a view, among other things, to guaranteeing better access to the job market.

Superhumans Program – ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Health is an important sector for Expertise France and you act even in a country at war like Ukraine. Concretely, what can you do in terms of health in this country.

Cassilde Brenière :

Health is a flagship sector for Expertise France in Ukraine. It is one of the 13 countries in which we have opened a country office, which is obviously not the case everywhere, since we cover nearly 150 countries.

Historically, we intervened via L’Initiative in support of the Ministry of Health and associations.

Since the outbreak of the war in 2022, we have developed and reoriented our programs to adapt our actions in a specific way to the urgent needs of reconstruction. We notably launched in January 2025 a program called REHAB, financed by the CDCS and AFD, to support Franco-Ukrainian hospital cooperation and the care of war amputees.

In connection with the AP-HP (public assistance – Paris Hospitals), French surgeons intervened to carry out maxillofacial surgery operations in connection with Ukrainian surgeons, a specialty that did not exist in Ukraine at the beginning of the conflict. In this regard we support the Superhumans center in Lviv and contributed to the launch of a second, in Odessa, whose opening is planned at the end of the first semester of this year.

The other major issue in the country concerns mental health. It will remain so even after the war. Expertise France supports the psychiatric hospital of Chernihiv via the APPUI Santé project, financed by the MEAE and the CDCS.

Flooding in Jordan – ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Access to water, sanitation and hygiene is a major issue that you hold particularly dear, as does AFD. The very strong demographic growth in Africa and the emergency, development, public health dimension of drinking water is a decisive issue among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals 2015-2030. How does Expertise France contribute to it.

Cassilde Brenière :

Climate change and its consequences (droughts, floods) require an urgent response. Our action in the water sector is multifaceted.

First, on integrated water resources management, we work with the OIEau in West Africa, in Latin America (Euroclima program) and in Georgia, both on good governance and on the valorization of watersheds.

Facing floods, we support the civil protection teams of partner countries in the drafting and updating of their prevention plans. The challenge is to ensure that in the event of an exceptional event, each of them can be organized to limit human impacts but also material ones. This work was carried out for 4 years with the teams of Beninese, Ivorian, Mauritanian, Togolese, Senegalese and Guinean firefighters.

Access to water services is also thought of in a Nexus emergency-development logic. We have for example worked in the east and north-east of Syria on the creation and management of water points, in direct link with local communities.

Finally, one of the axes of reflection concerns urban planning, at the heart of African cities which crystallize the challenges of the century (territorial planning – growing population). In this regard we carry out a very beautiful project with several cities in Ghana within the framework of the Sustainable Cities program.

Alain Boinet – Africa is a continent that experiences very strong demographic growth, which causes for these countries an immense challenge for the years and decades to come. Among all these countries, there is one which has a long-standing recurrent conflict while having an immense development potential for one of the most numerous populations of the continent, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Would you have an example of a project that you carry out in the DRC.

Cassilde Brenière :

The DRC is a major country for Expertise France. Around sixty collaborators work there within the Kinshasa country office.

Our action focuses notably on entrepreneurship. We have a support project for these driving forces called “Pour Elles”. It aims to support women, actors of the Congolese private sector, by financing training activities, by involving national incubators and by promoting female leadership in this job creation process. The aim is to boost the formal sector, because today, many of them suffer from an informal activity that limits their access to labor law.

Pour Elles also has a sports and cultural component. This project aims to bring out inspiring figures and to support a positive dynamic in the country through the practice of sport and the valorization of cultural and heritage riches.

Women entrepreneurs DRC – ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Today, global migratory movements constitute a considerable issue, both for northern and southern countries and for public opinions and governments. What type of project do you develop in this field.

Cassilde Brenière :

Migrations concern both so-called Northern countries, and Southern ones. The majority of migrations are moreover between Southern countries, but they are perceived as an issue of domestic policy everywhere in the world.

We work on public migration policies along the entire chain by relying a lot on diasporas, which often have one foot “on both sides” and ultimately belong to both worlds.

When I speak of the entire chain I refer to the fight against human trafficking, the criminal chain, justice, the police and the care of migrants, but also the development of human capital and circular migrations.

The return of populations is therefore a crucial subject. In Morocco for example, the PRIM program supports sub-Saharan migrants and return migrants to facilitate access to rights, to social protection, and to economic integration but also diasporas that invest in their territories of origin.

We also develop circular migration programs, a subject of interest for many European countries whose demography is declining. With an impact notably in sectors such as agriculture, tourism, in connection with vocational training and supervised reception, to allow legal, protected and temporary migrations.

Our approach to migrations is accompanied by a mantra “triple win” : win for the country of origin, win for the migrant person, and win for France.

Alain Boinet – For crisis actors, notably humanitarians, what is called the Nexus, that is to say the coordination of emergency, development, even peace actions, is essential over time. How do you contribute to this process and what can be the role of the private sector as an actor of economic and social development.

Cassilde Brenière :

We seek to support countries in mobilizing their own domestic resources, in Palestine, we collaborate with the Ministry of Finance on resource mobilization, and on customs in order to be able to have sustainable local/national budgets. In Haiti, particular attention is paid to the fight against corruption and illicit trafficking thanks to the strengthening of customs services. In Senegal, on diverted assets that can be returned to the State, more than 50 million could be returned to it.

Concerning the private sector, one of our strategies, which is moreover the one carried by the European Union through what is called the Global Gateway, is to attract investments and mobilize private or local financing to finance development in a lasting way.

It is about creating the conditions for investment by the local private sector or the international and European private sector. This means working on a clear framework between the State, the private sector and the populations. This is what is called the enabling environment: making sure to create a regulatory framework, promoting the digitalization of services, and structuring the new commercial corridors.

On this subject of transfer corridors, the aim is to rethink paths, roads, and the approach to very constraining customs barriers between African countries. More intra-African trade is the guarantee of strong wealth creation and consolidated private investments.

Finally, there is another issue expressed by the private sector that I meet a lot when I go into the field: the need for manpower. There is an issue of vocational training and education. We are attentive to it, and support training institutes in sectors under strain (mines, digital), in order to create the conditions for sustainable investment.

Mechatronics department of IPRC Tumba, financed by the AFTER project of AFD: construction of classrooms, equipped laboratories and recruitment of qualified instructors. Students are working on the printing of a robotic arm using a 3D printer.  ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – You are a reader of Défis Humanitaires. What is for you its added value and what would you like to find more of in the new formula which will appear in the spring to adapt to the new context of geopolitical rupture and the fall of aid financing.

Cassilde Brenière :

First, I have a lot of regard for the humanitarian world. Even if we practice different professions and have sometimes occupied distinct postures, we are very complementary. The partnership between the State, its operators and French civil society is essential and we need civil societies to have a real impact.

We are today in a deeply transformed context, marked by a decrease in financing. This is no longer the world of before. This implies a renewal of technical cooperation, of France’s actions, but also of the humanitarian world.

What I particularly appreciate is the very practical character of the Défis humanitaires journal. Expertise France is also an operator, indeed we work on direct impacts, with concrete tools and experiences to share. There is also a challenge of convincing public opinion more and of showing shared interests.

We see it for example in hospital cooperation. During a recent event, Clotilde DURAND, Head of service, Deputy to the Director General of the Care Offer, Ministry of Health explained that she was often asked why cooperate with Ukraine while the French health system is under strain. Yet, shared interests are obvious, notably on questions of global health and pandemic. Expertise France worked with Guineans on the Ebola epidemic, which they managed to control: it was also in the interest of France.

These cooperations also enrich our professionals. Pneumologists from the AP-HP, engaged on a project in Rwanda, were confronted with clinical cases new to them and that made them progress.

It is important to show — notably through Défis Humanitaires — that these actions serve an objective of solidarity, a value that we defend, but that they also nourish France and strengthen shared interests.

In the current geopolitical context, marked by interdependence (global health, security, climate), we face global challenges that we will not be able to resolve alone.

Défis Humanitaires can highlight concrete, operational cases, which show how humanitarian action and technical cooperation benefit partner countries, beneficiaries, but also France and peace.

Alain Boinet –How would you like to conclude this interview ?

Cassilde Brenière :

I think that we are today at a real crossroads. Between humanitarian action and technical cooperation, there are many common points and we have every interest in sharing our experiences more. One of our specificities is to be a governmental agency and that is part of our identity. In the world that is opening before us, marked by more interdependence but also polarization, human ties are more essential than ever. They play a fundamental role.

For the future, I also believe that it is important to give a stronger role to Europe. We are a deeply European agency and that represents a real asset. Our models, our institutions and our values are levers on which we must rely to work together.

Working in partner countries is also co-constructing, learning from each other and progressing collectively. It is an immense richness.

Our exchanges with France Volontaires, for example, show that there still exist today in France many vocations among young people. These are forces that must be mobilized together.

I would therefore like to conclude on these very positive words, sincerely thanking you for this interview and for your commitment in the face of humanitarian challenges.


Cassilde Brenière– Deputy Director General of Expertise France

Agricultural engineer and of Rural Engineering of Waters and Forests, Cassilde Brenière has contributed for more than 25 years to the emergence of development models having concrete results on final beneficiaries.

After 15 years of experience in the private and associative sector, as a technical assistant among other things in Colombia, Burkina Faso, in the Philippines and in Romania then in charge of an operational unit for the operation of water and sanitation services serving 600,000 inhabitants in the suburbs of Paris, she joined the French Development Agency in 2009, as a project manager, before becoming head of the division in charge of all water and sanitation projects financed by AFD in the world.

In 2016, she expatriates to Morocco to become deputy director of the AFD agency in Rabat for 4 years where she supervised the teams of one of the largest AFD agencies and brought out new activities favorable to gender equality, a strong commitment of her entire professional and personal path.

She is then appointed deputy director of the Executive Operations Directorate of AFD in Paris in 2020 then deputy director general in charge of operations of Expertise France in 2023.

Since she joined AFD, Cassilde had at heart to contribute to the international debate on water and natural resources, climate in particular on adaptation, gender and their financing as well as to the evolution of AFD’s ways of doing on the strengthening of institutions, accountability and overall the posture of AFD as a donor.

Humanitarian aid lost, disoriented, misguided—what twists and turns lie ahead, what future awaits?

Forum Espace Humanitaire 30 janvier 2026 Science Po Saint-Germain-en Laye. ©Stanislas Bonnet TGH.

The Forum Espace Humanitaire (FEH) brought together on 30 January 2026 at Science Po Saint-Germain-en-Laye around fifty humanitarian NGO leaders around the question “Lost in transition? Historical, civic and future-oriented perspectives on a humanitarian sector in danger”.

Having taken part in this Forum, as in the previous ones for more than 10 years, and given the gravity of the current situation for the humanitarian sector, it seems useful to share with our readers information and reflection on it while respecting the rule adopted by the FEH consisting in speaking freely without the speakers and their remarks being publicly quoted.

Regarding the title chosen by the organizers “Lost in transition”, several translations into French are possible: Lost in the period of transition, or also disoriented, even adrift, which convey well that the humanitarian sector has entered a critical phase of its history.

In Davos, Mark Carney, the Prime Minister of Canada, declared “We are in the middle of a rupture, not in the middle of a transition” and I believe this is right. However, humanitarians must take on their transition within the geopolitical rupture of the world order and its multiple consequences, including the fall in public funding!

In this editorial, I propose first to present the 10 main questions that I retained from this Forum. This is not a report, and this overview is not exhaustive of the subject or of the debates that took place.

Then, I invite you to return to three areas of “rupture” currently under way: the multifaceted geopolitical shock, the shock to humanitarian funding, to access for aid and to international humanitarian law and, as a consequence, the ongoing project for the evolution of our review Défis Humanitaires.

A – The 10 key questions of the Forum: summary, analysis, commentary.

1. Lost, disoriented, adrift? We are moving from a period of triumphant right of interference (1991 UN Resolution 688 on Iraq and the protection of the Kurdish population), from the multiplication of Western interventions (Somalia, Iraq, Serbia, Afghanistan) and those of multiple so-called UN peace operations (Iraq, Bosnia, DRC) to a questioning of the rules established since 1945 and to a brutal fall in the funding of humanitarian and development aid. The invasion of Ukraine by Russia and the second election of Donald Trump are the two determining causes. Faced with this “geopolitical tsunami” and the retreat of NGO capacities of more than a decade, doing nothing or “keeping a low profile” would be one of the riskiest options! If humanitarian history over the long term has always been punctuated by crises, this one is equivalent to a tsunami.

historical coverage coordinated humanitarian plan 2018-2026 ©Financial Tracking Service

2.The “humanitarian ship in the eye of the cyclone” with devastating winds changing direction, to take up the image of one speaker. To save all or part of the ship and the crew, it will be necessary to adapt to winds, currents and waves while maintaining the final course of saving lives. “The goal is the path.” I repeat, doing nothing, “keeping a low profile” while waiting for it to pass is certainly a serious risk to avoid. Thus, for example, such NGO will lose 50% of its budget in 3 years! If NGOs financed entirely or almost entirely by individuals escape the fall in their funding, they do not escape the upheaval of the ecosystem. On the very day of the FEH, the UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, was alerting Member States to a risk of “imminent financial collapse”! It is the entire multilateral system that is at risk and which is de facto already being challenged by Donald Trump’s “Peace Council”. However, the humanitarian needs of 300 million human beings are still there and guide the mission of humanitarian organizations, which must adapt, reform or revolutionize themselves depending on their respective situations and choices.

The mixed Solidarités International-Veolia team around an Aquaforce 2000 in Ukraine. ©Fondation Veolia

3. Commitment and efficiency. The consensus on humanitarian aid responding to the vital needs of populations in danger once again does not prevent the debate between the priority of commitment and values and the priority of the efficiency of aid. This debate often brings out the distinction between advocacy actors and those of aid action in the field. But, frankly, the only response that seems to me to be valid is indeed that of effective commitment that optimizes every euro to save lives. Everything lies in the dynamic balance between the two approaches, between the purpose and the means of achieving it. It appears clearly that organizations that primarily prioritize action and those that mainly carry advocacy do not give the same priority to the two terms of the equation. But is advocacy not at the service of aid, and do these not need to plead their cause ?

4. Humanitarian action and civil society. Usually, the support of civil society is expressed through donations, volunteering and support for the major causes carried by humanitarian organizations. Some consider that associative freedoms are receding and are threatened, while others emphasize the weakness of the narrative of associations. What is certain is that public opinion evolves according to the environment and that today issues of security, defense, social model, national cohesion and international security particularly concern it. Just as states governed by the rule of law, in France and in Europe in particular, must face growing threats, they will have to strengthen their governance, their power and their unity in order to exist, mobilize and resist. Let us not be mistaken, the nation-state is not an NGO. Humanitarians must also rethink their place, their legitimacy and their communication in a changing, disrupted and risky environment.

5. Politicization and humanitarian principles. Some think that politicization is the necessary response to political attacks, while others consider that humanitarian principles (neutrality, impartiality, independence) constitute the best posture in all cases. What nevertheless seems certain is that the exacerbation of both political and geopolitical cleavages will directly affect humanitarian organizations. It is a dilemma and a matter of conscience. For my part, I believe that the response is twofold. On the one hand, we have a greater need for political and geopolitical analysis capacities. On the other hand, we must be and remain humanitarians. The choice is simple. Faced with a political injunction, responding with a political position will identify us as a political actor and will reduce our credibility and the humanitarian space that must bring people together broadly and place itself above partisan choices. Humanitarian action is neither right nor left and must bring together as widely as possible. This is exactly what we do in crisis areas where we act in the name of the impartiality of aid. Making a political choice is of course possible for any humanitarian, but then within a political organization. I believe that the principles of the Red Cross of Henri Dunant are more relevant than ever.

6. Decolonization, de-Westernization of aid. If aid is no one’s privilege and if proximity to affected people is the primary link of mutual aid, it is also true that funding and international aid organizations come essentially from the developed world, Western for the most part. Incidentally, humanitarians consider that their action is a duty of humanity outside of any intention to colonize anyone. These few lines will not put an end to this debate. However, I suggest two attitudes in the face of this question. The first, which has always fundamentally been mine, is to consider that where we act, outside France, we are not at home but at their home. Let us add that if universalism considers without distinction the humanity of each person, it must simultaneously respect the natural diversity of humankind, cultures, languages, religions, ways of life, ethnicities, in particular minorities, the sovereignty of these populations over their lands, which is a strong response to any attempt at colonization. Like everyone, I know that the history of humanity is more complex, that confrontation between the planet’s co-tenants is regular, but these existential reference points exist as useful and just markers. The second reflection is to consider that if the history of colonization in its diversity is also universal in time and space, we must today consider this question in the light of the ruptures under way and the risks of vassalization, including our own.

Mark Carney at the World Economic Forum ©World Economic Forum

7. Humanitarian action and geopolitics. This subject was not on the Forum’s agenda, but I raise it because I believe it is decisive. Let us return to the formula we can take up “act local, think global”, that is, the relationship between macro and micro. We humanitarians would need to understand well the major role that wars and United Nations operations have played for decades in the existence and development of humanitarian organizations, both through public funding and through private support largely fueled by the media. This observation in no way calls into question the validity of their action to save lives, but it allows us to understand that the fall in humanitarian funding from ODA coming from Member States of the European Union with governments of the right as well as of the left, even before Donald Trump’s decisions, is indeed of a geopolitical nature. The priorities of States, at least in Europe, are today more oriented towards the defense of freedom, independence, sovereignty and therefore towards security, but also towards safeguarding our social model. As Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada, rightly says: “When the rules no longer protect you, you must protect yourselves.”

©WFP/Sayed Asif Mahmud A – A UN vehicle crosses a destroyed city in Ukraine

8. Humanitarian action, war and Ukraine. This question was also not on the FEH agenda and I add it as a continuation of the geopolitics linked to it. Apart from disasters and major pandemics, humanitarian action is mainly due to the consequences of war, most often in poor countries where populations quickly fall into precariousness and threat to their very lives. Think of Sudan, the DRC or Yemen today. Certainly, one cannot address all subjects in a single Forum. But let us not forget the reality that challenges us. According to the ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross), the number of conflicts continues to increase: there were nearly 130 in 2024, twice as many as 15 years ago. Among these conflicts, around twenty have lasted for more than two decades. Thus, at the time I write these lines, more than 204 million people live in a conflict zone. Needs are increasing, resources are decreasing, what are we doing to provide aid and to influence the concerned decision-makers who are currently retreating? Back to the reality of the urgency of crises.

9. Degradation of debates. Quite rightly, one of the speakers highlighted the general degradation of debates, of analysis, of nuance. I will add the growing phenomenon of disinformation, propaganda, so-called alternative truth. We must keep this clearly in mind and ourselves practice discernment, foresight, projection and ensure benevolence among ourselves, which does not prevent either debates or disagreements. This is precisely one of the axes of reflection of the revamped Défis Humanitaires project.

10. Entirely provisional conclusion. The environment is changing radically and yet humanitarian action is more necessary than ever in a more populated world that is entering a period of strategic conflictuality that will affect many countries and populations, as in the time of the “Cold War”. We must cross the desert as well as the storm and renew ourselves to carry out the humanitarian mission, here and elsewhere, on the “Land of Men” dear to the humanist Antoine de Saint-Exupéry.

B- Focus sur la logique des ruptures en cours et le que faire.

Two major events alone summarize the rupture and are at the center of the geopolitical cyclone that is shaking and recomposing our world.

The military invasion by Russia – a member of the UN Security Council – of Ukraine, if it is a failure for everyone, signifies that a dispute can now once again be settled by the force of arms. Ukraine will enter on 22 February 2026 its 5th year of this war in Europe, which could perhaps spread to other territories of this continent without the support of the United States being certain. War is also a humanitarian issue because of its human and material consequences. Are humanitarians ready for a possible extension of war territories?

Trump at the World Economic Forum – ©White House

The second election of Donald Trump in the United States has since January 2025 caused a vast and profound earthquake in that country and throughout the world. The code of international relations under the aegis of the UN is now replaced by the law of the strongest “deal”. In the space of a decree, Donald Trump has annihilated humanitarian and development aid through the more or less equal law of trade and exchanges. To better understand, one must read the new “National Security Strategy of the United States”. Without prejudging what follows, I recall this sentence of Pierre Hassner, historian of international relations, who declared during the invasion of Iraq by the United States in March 2003 that “the complexity of the world will take its revenge”!

The abrupt and strong fall in humanitarian and development funding is of course the signal of a change of era and of priorities. Let us recall that if the weight of the United States as the world’s leading funder has a major impact, this trend is just as much the result of the Member States of the European Union and the OECD. The only good news to date is the confirmation of the humanitarian budget of the European Commission with ECHO for a 2026 budget of 1.9 billion euros and 415 million of reserve funds for emergencies. In Davos, Commissioner Hadja Lahbib advocated “new alliances” towards companies, investors, innovation actors in order to ensure new financing models. The avenues are numerous provided one has conviction and will. The main stake now lies in the next budget of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) of the European Union for the period 2028-2034. It is up to us to act!

EU humanitarian aid 2026 – ©ECHO

Rising to the Humanitarian Challenges.

These ruptures will trigger many others in chain, according to the domino effect, with global consequences for humanitarian and development aid as well as for the 17 Sustainable Development Goals 2015-2030.

In this context, Défis Humanitaires has launched a project of adaptation, evolution, even change, so that its monthly online review better responds to the ruptures under way, to humanitarian imperatives and to the expectations of readers. This project is carried by its Committee of Experts, by its readers and by the ongoing debates.

This project, to which we invite you to associate yourselves, integrates the following evolutions:

  • A new media-press-type layout to gain impact.
  • Quick search functionalities for articles by author and by theme.
  • The publication of “briefs” on current affairs.
  • An evolution of the editorial line.
  • A strengthening of our editorial team to achieve this.

In this new issue of Défis Humanitaires, you will discover articles on the crisis in Syria, on a new innovative tool the Solis bot, an analysis of humanitarian funding of Official Development Assistance, reader testimonials and this editorial.

If these articles are useful to you, if you enjoy reading our independent and free review, you can give it the means to do better and more by making a donation today (faireundon) deductible by two thirds (66%) of your taxes thanks to the tax receipt that we will send you.

I warmly thank you for your support, which supports our volunteer work to better inform you. Thank you.

Alain Boinet.