Expertise France, interview with Cassilde Brenière, Deputy Director General

https://www.afd.fr/fr/lac-victoria-eau-potable-accessible Workers are working at the Butimba water treatment station in Mwanza. AFD supported the construction and rehabilitation of water-related infrastructures, such as new water intakes and treatment control stations, in order to help the city of Mwanza meet the sanitation needs of its growing population. ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Hello Cassilde Brenière. We thank you for this interview for Défis Humanitaires. To begin, for our readers, could you present to us the action of Expertise France and your role.

Cassilde Brenière :

Thank you very much Alain, thank you for coming here to Expertise France and for taking an interest in our agency.

Expertise France is the French agency for international technical cooperation. For my part, I am Deputy Chief Executive Officer of the agency, in charge of operations.

Expertise France was created in 2015 through the merger of six operators previously housed within different ministries. This creation marked a desire for renewal of French technical cooperation. Since then, the agency has experienced significant growth, its turnover has multiplied by five and it is today the second largest European technical cooperation agency, with €570M in activity volume in 2025. We now count more than 2,500 collaborators including 1,700 in the field. It is this local anchoring which moreover constitutes our strength.

We are an interministerial governmental agency and, since 2022, a subsidiary of the French Development Agency (AFD). Our funding comes essentially from the European Union, from AFD and from French ministries.

Our hallmark rests on our capacity to mobilize, often in peer-to-peer approaches, French and European actors, local actors and to co-construct projects in support of public policies.

https://www.afd.fr/fr/actualites/exister-officiellement-sans-papiers-haiti Verification of administrative documents: an essential gesture to strengthen local governance and access to rights.

Alain Boinet – When one visits the Expertise France website, one realizes the very great diversity of your fields of expertise and intervention in the 4 corners of the world. Can you present your areas of action, your missions and your staff, your partnership policy both in the field and in terms of financing.

Cassilde Brenière :

We operate around six major technical domains, structured into departments.

The first is sustainable development where we work on climate, biodiversity, urban policies, circular economy, agriculture and agricultural value chains.

The second is governance notably financial governance stemming from the former agency ADETEF, which merged within Expertise France. We work on support to issues of structuring taxation, customs, the fight against corruption, budget management, or even the public expenditure chain. We also intervene on strengthening the consideration of human rights, gender, migration, justice and State reform.

The third domain is that of peace, stability and security. We are present in several crisis contexts such as in Syria, in Haiti, in Ethiopia, or even in Ukraine, where we intervene in a cross-cutting manner since 2016. I will come back to this.

The fourth domain, which is our primary field of action and also the most important in terms of project implementation, is health. L’Initiative, which we carry, aims to fight HIV, tuberculosis and malaria. This is a vast program financed by the French contribution to the Global Fund. But we also work to guarantee resilient and equitable health systems, notably by relying on the consideration of human resources in health.

The fifth domain concerns education, vocational training and social protection, with a French model often mobilized in exchanges of experience.

Finally, the sixth domain, which is growing strongly, corresponds to support for the private sector, the sustainable economy and the business environment, in order to promote private investments in partner countries.

On the geographical level, more than 50% of our activity is in Africa, but the specificity of our mandate allows us to intervene in all countries of the world, such as in Latin America, in Asia or in Europe, notably in Ukraine and in Greece.

To do so, we work with many partners: French public administrations (ministries, Court of Auditors..), hospitals, AP-HP, university hospitals, but also local and international civil society.

Alain Boinet – Among all your partners, there is notably civil society and national and international NGOs. How do you cooperate concretely with these actors and what is the specific added value of this sector.

Cassilde Brenière :

Civil society is a major partner of Expertise France. Last year, around 100 million euros were mobilized in direct funding from French civil society but above all from local civil society.

We work, directly, with many associations; for example on the PAGOF program (Partnership for an Open Government) in several West African countries, in Morocco, in Senegal, in Côte d’Ivoire and in Tunisia. The aim is to strengthen public transparency and access to data, by working both with States and with members of civil society. We also mobilize CFI (Canal France International) to strengthen journalists, fact-checking and the role of civil society as a bulwark.

Another example: the European program Africa-Europe Youth Academy (AEYA), which aims to strengthen youth leadership in 18 African countries. We fund associations, and collaborate with universities and schools to develop the skills and leadership of youth through training, mentoring, and spaces for dialogue, with a view, among other things, to guaranteeing better access to the job market.

Superhumans Program – ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Health is an important sector for Expertise France and you act even in a country at war like Ukraine. Concretely, what can you do in terms of health in this country.

Cassilde Brenière :

Health is a flagship sector for Expertise France in Ukraine. It is one of the 13 countries in which we have opened a country office, which is obviously not the case everywhere, since we cover nearly 150 countries.

Historically, we intervened via L’Initiative in support of the Ministry of Health and associations.

Since the outbreak of the war in 2022, we have developed and reoriented our programs to adapt our actions in a specific way to the urgent needs of reconstruction. We notably launched in January 2025 a program called REHAB, financed by the CDCS and AFD, to support Franco-Ukrainian hospital cooperation and the care of war amputees.

In connection with the AP-HP (public assistance – Paris Hospitals), French surgeons intervened to carry out maxillofacial surgery operations in connection with Ukrainian surgeons, a specialty that did not exist in Ukraine at the beginning of the conflict. In this regard we support the Superhumans center in Lviv and contributed to the launch of a second, in Odessa, whose opening is planned at the end of the first semester of this year.

The other major issue in the country concerns mental health. It will remain so even after the war. Expertise France supports the psychiatric hospital of Chernihiv via the APPUI Santé project, financed by the MEAE and the CDCS.

Flooding in Jordan – ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Access to water, sanitation and hygiene is a major issue that you hold particularly dear, as does AFD. The very strong demographic growth in Africa and the emergency, development, public health dimension of drinking water is a decisive issue among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals 2015-2030. How does Expertise France contribute to it.

Cassilde Brenière :

Climate change and its consequences (droughts, floods) require an urgent response. Our action in the water sector is multifaceted.

First, on integrated water resources management, we work with the OIEau in West Africa, in Latin America (Euroclima program) and in Georgia, both on good governance and on the valorization of watersheds.

Facing floods, we support the civil protection teams of partner countries in the drafting and updating of their prevention plans. The challenge is to ensure that in the event of an exceptional event, each of them can be organized to limit human impacts but also material ones. This work was carried out for 4 years with the teams of Beninese, Ivorian, Mauritanian, Togolese, Senegalese and Guinean firefighters.

Access to water services is also thought of in a Nexus emergency-development logic. We have for example worked in the east and north-east of Syria on the creation and management of water points, in direct link with local communities.

Finally, one of the axes of reflection concerns urban planning, at the heart of African cities which crystallize the challenges of the century (territorial planning – growing population). In this regard we carry out a very beautiful project with several cities in Ghana within the framework of the Sustainable Cities program.

Alain Boinet – Africa is a continent that experiences very strong demographic growth, which causes for these countries an immense challenge for the years and decades to come. Among all these countries, there is one which has a long-standing recurrent conflict while having an immense development potential for one of the most numerous populations of the continent, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Would you have an example of a project that you carry out in the DRC.

Cassilde Brenière :

The DRC is a major country for Expertise France. Around sixty collaborators work there within the Kinshasa country office.

Our action focuses notably on entrepreneurship. We have a support project for these driving forces called “Pour Elles”. It aims to support women, actors of the Congolese private sector, by financing training activities, by involving national incubators and by promoting female leadership in this job creation process. The aim is to boost the formal sector, because today, many of them suffer from an informal activity that limits their access to labor law.

Pour Elles also has a sports and cultural component. This project aims to bring out inspiring figures and to support a positive dynamic in the country through the practice of sport and the valorization of cultural and heritage riches.

Women entrepreneurs DRC – ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – Today, global migratory movements constitute a considerable issue, both for northern and southern countries and for public opinions and governments. What type of project do you develop in this field.

Cassilde Brenière :

Migrations concern both so-called Northern countries, and Southern ones. The majority of migrations are moreover between Southern countries, but they are perceived as an issue of domestic policy everywhere in the world.

We work on public migration policies along the entire chain by relying a lot on diasporas, which often have one foot “on both sides” and ultimately belong to both worlds.

When I speak of the entire chain I refer to the fight against human trafficking, the criminal chain, justice, the police and the care of migrants, but also the development of human capital and circular migrations.

The return of populations is therefore a crucial subject. In Morocco for example, the PRIM program supports sub-Saharan migrants and return migrants to facilitate access to rights, to social protection, and to economic integration but also diasporas that invest in their territories of origin.

We also develop circular migration programs, a subject of interest for many European countries whose demography is declining. With an impact notably in sectors such as agriculture, tourism, in connection with vocational training and supervised reception, to allow legal, protected and temporary migrations.

Our approach to migrations is accompanied by a mantra “triple win” : win for the country of origin, win for the migrant person, and win for France.

Alain Boinet – For crisis actors, notably humanitarians, what is called the Nexus, that is to say the coordination of emergency, development, even peace actions, is essential over time. How do you contribute to this process and what can be the role of the private sector as an actor of economic and social development.

Cassilde Brenière :

We seek to support countries in mobilizing their own domestic resources, in Palestine, we collaborate with the Ministry of Finance on resource mobilization, and on customs in order to be able to have sustainable local/national budgets. In Haiti, particular attention is paid to the fight against corruption and illicit trafficking thanks to the strengthening of customs services. In Senegal, on diverted assets that can be returned to the State, more than 50 million could be returned to it.

Concerning the private sector, one of our strategies, which is moreover the one carried by the European Union through what is called the Global Gateway, is to attract investments and mobilize private or local financing to finance development in a lasting way.

It is about creating the conditions for investment by the local private sector or the international and European private sector. This means working on a clear framework between the State, the private sector and the populations. This is what is called the enabling environment: making sure to create a regulatory framework, promoting the digitalization of services, and structuring the new commercial corridors.

On this subject of transfer corridors, the aim is to rethink paths, roads, and the approach to very constraining customs barriers between African countries. More intra-African trade is the guarantee of strong wealth creation and consolidated private investments.

Finally, there is another issue expressed by the private sector that I meet a lot when I go into the field: the need for manpower. There is an issue of vocational training and education. We are attentive to it, and support training institutes in sectors under strain (mines, digital), in order to create the conditions for sustainable investment.

Mechatronics department of IPRC Tumba, financed by the AFTER project of AFD: construction of classrooms, equipped laboratories and recruitment of qualified instructors. Students are working on the printing of a robotic arm using a 3D printer.  ©Expertise France

Alain Boinet – You are a reader of Défis Humanitaires. What is for you its added value and what would you like to find more of in the new formula which will appear in the spring to adapt to the new context of geopolitical rupture and the fall of aid financing.

Cassilde Brenière :

First, I have a lot of regard for the humanitarian world. Even if we practice different professions and have sometimes occupied distinct postures, we are very complementary. The partnership between the State, its operators and French civil society is essential and we need civil societies to have a real impact.

We are today in a deeply transformed context, marked by a decrease in financing. This is no longer the world of before. This implies a renewal of technical cooperation, of France’s actions, but also of the humanitarian world.

What I particularly appreciate is the very practical character of the Défis humanitaires journal. Expertise France is also an operator, indeed we work on direct impacts, with concrete tools and experiences to share. There is also a challenge of convincing public opinion more and of showing shared interests.

We see it for example in hospital cooperation. During a recent event, Clotilde DURAND, Head of service, Deputy to the Director General of the Care Offer, Ministry of Health explained that she was often asked why cooperate with Ukraine while the French health system is under strain. Yet, shared interests are obvious, notably on questions of global health and pandemic. Expertise France worked with Guineans on the Ebola epidemic, which they managed to control: it was also in the interest of France.

These cooperations also enrich our professionals. Pneumologists from the AP-HP, engaged on a project in Rwanda, were confronted with clinical cases new to them and that made them progress.

It is important to show — notably through Défis Humanitaires — that these actions serve an objective of solidarity, a value that we defend, but that they also nourish France and strengthen shared interests.

In the current geopolitical context, marked by interdependence (global health, security, climate), we face global challenges that we will not be able to resolve alone.

Défis Humanitaires can highlight concrete, operational cases, which show how humanitarian action and technical cooperation benefit partner countries, beneficiaries, but also France and peace.

Alain Boinet –How would you like to conclude this interview ?

Cassilde Brenière :

I think that we are today at a real crossroads. Between humanitarian action and technical cooperation, there are many common points and we have every interest in sharing our experiences more. One of our specificities is to be a governmental agency and that is part of our identity. In the world that is opening before us, marked by more interdependence but also polarization, human ties are more essential than ever. They play a fundamental role.

For the future, I also believe that it is important to give a stronger role to Europe. We are a deeply European agency and that represents a real asset. Our models, our institutions and our values are levers on which we must rely to work together.

Working in partner countries is also co-constructing, learning from each other and progressing collectively. It is an immense richness.

Our exchanges with France Volontaires, for example, show that there still exist today in France many vocations among young people. These are forces that must be mobilized together.

I would therefore like to conclude on these very positive words, sincerely thanking you for this interview and for your commitment in the face of humanitarian challenges.


Cassilde Brenière– Deputy Director General of Expertise France

Agricultural engineer and of Rural Engineering of Waters and Forests, Cassilde Brenière has contributed for more than 25 years to the emergence of development models having concrete results on final beneficiaries.

After 15 years of experience in the private and associative sector, as a technical assistant among other things in Colombia, Burkina Faso, in the Philippines and in Romania then in charge of an operational unit for the operation of water and sanitation services serving 600,000 inhabitants in the suburbs of Paris, she joined the French Development Agency in 2009, as a project manager, before becoming head of the division in charge of all water and sanitation projects financed by AFD in the world.

In 2016, she expatriates to Morocco to become deputy director of the AFD agency in Rabat for 4 years where she supervised the teams of one of the largest AFD agencies and brought out new activities favorable to gender equality, a strong commitment of her entire professional and personal path.

She is then appointed deputy director of the Executive Operations Directorate of AFD in Paris in 2020 then deputy director general in charge of operations of Expertise France in 2023.

Since she joined AFD, Cassilde had at heart to contribute to the international debate on water and natural resources, climate in particular on adaptation, gender and their financing as well as to the evolution of AFD’s ways of doing on the strengthening of institutions, accountability and overall the posture of AFD as a donor.

THE GLORIOUS YEARS – Interview with Bernard Kouchner

Bernard Kouchner in Hassakeh at the “International Forum on Water in Northeastern Syria,” September 27–28, 2021. Photo by Alain Boinet.

Alain Boinet: When one thinks of UN Security Council Resolution 688 of April 5, 1991, on Iraq, aimed at protecting civilians and the Kurds, how does it resonate with you in light of the geopolitical situation in 2025 and the ways conflicts are resolved? What is your assessment?

Bernard Kouchner: What is happening? We have all worked for human rights, development, humanitarian missions, anti-racism, and social justice. We continue to do so, but we must recognize that these values no longer hold the same allure. Is it a failure? No, I do not believe so, but it is at least an unfortunate pause.

The Kurds! A word about them: the largest stateless people, a remnant forgotten by colonialism, our discovery in Iraq at Hadj Omran, one night listening to the great Massoud Barzani, an old warrior who remained a democrat… It was in the early 1970s! And thirty years after Security Council Resolution 688, here we are unearthing it again, more than thirty years later—a major advancement in humanitarian law, once called “the mother of all resolutions.”

The world has changed. The Kurds are no longer unknown. They have fought hard; NGOs, the French, and Americans, among others, politically supported their efforts. Not enough. Here is a good example of the necessary mix of politics and humanitarian action. Certainly, the Kurds, trapped between Turkish, Iraqi, Syrian, and Iranian territories, are not united. They fight in different situations. Not to mention a significant, fragmented diaspora.

Whether humanitarian or political, we must continue alongside the Kurds. Everything has evolved, but the persistence of humanitarian commitments from NGOs was decisive. In Iran, repression remains perhaps the most violent; in Iraq, the Kurds are nearly autonomous. In Syria, the situation is unstable, and the new bearded leader inspires little confidence.

For the Kurds, is independence the next step? A single Kurdish state? Is this a shared desire? To achieve that, a common language and ideology would need to be built. It will take decades.

AB: In your view, what does Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and Donald Trump’s election signify for international relations, and what consequences might this have in the future?

BK: Let’s not confuse the two phenomena, even though they complement each other. We must consider the “rightward shift” of global public opinion, which exists and is strengthening. Do poor populations frighten the rich? The violent rejection of immigration points in this direction. The failure of socialist struggles and hopes reinforces this sentiment.

For Vladimir Putin, invading Ukraine is about forcibly reclaiming the borders of the former Soviet Empire. Let us recall that the Russians themselves (Yeltsin) authorized Ukraine’s independence and referendum. We had already followed the events in Georgia and Crimea. Will the Moscow army go further? Will they invade the Baltic states? Many French citizens believe so; many Europeans think the same. I personally do not believe in an immediate expansion of the war. The Russian economy is faltering, and the Ukrainians are not giving in. But undoubtedly, the risk exists.

We must strengthen our European defenses and persist in the old idea, this stubborn support for a “Europe of defense.” It should be noted that Donald Trump, in one of his oscillations, seemed to give in to Putin’s reasoning, and he does not seem to know the region’s history. Trump likes meeting Putin. Will the U.S. President add betrayal to diplomatic recklessness? He changes his mind often—a bad point—but when he persists, it is a good point. I do not yet know the outcome of this confrontation; what I understand regarding taxes and the economy frightens me. He has not finished shocking us. If Donald Trump does not appear as a great politician in the classical sense, he seems to be a top-level golfer.

Indeed, the century wavers.

Washington Summit on Ukraine, August 2025 ©The White House

AB: In his book Occident ennemi mondial numéro 1, Jean-François Colosimo emphasizes the conquering resurgence of former empires—Russian, Persian, Turkish, Chinese—and adds the United States. In this new context, what becomes of Europe, its countries, and democracy?

BK: Yes, the old empires are regaining ambition. Disputes over ideologies, capitalism and socialism, are rarer, but differences in living standards remain, and the poor and the rich are still with us. Europe—the one we wanted united—has become a target for other nations of all tendencies. Is it still an example, a hope, or a regret?

All of them, for different reasons, are irritated by these old democracies, by their convulsions, but even more so by their cultures and ways of life. And what is to become of Europe—should it make us despair? Not even a unanimous communiqué from all 27 European countries on the terrifying bombings of Moscow, which went on for many long months, despite the firm positions of President Macron and British Prime Minister Starmer. We maintained that Vladimir Putin was threatening all of Europe. The European countries remained vague.

And suddenly, thanks to the courage of Volodymyr Zelensky and the Ukrainian people, after a very forceful alliance between the British (who had left Europe) and the French, politics changed pace. Fear of a conflict spread, judgment of Vladimir Putin grew harsher. And the Washington conference finally gave a dimension that went beyond the first impressions of Trump’s alignment with the most harmful positions of Putin, supported by the very violent and deadly bombings on Ukraine. But very quickly, we fell back into vagueness.

Trump–Putin Meeting, Alaska 2025 ©The White House

AB: What becomes of the UN in all this? It seems paralyzed, marginalized, or submissive. Will it meet the fate of the League of Nations?

BK: The UN remains a disappointed hope. The UN is in a state of brain death. Not even a last resort. The UN does not move forward, but it still has some remnants of presence. For example, it remains stationed at the border between Lebanon and Israel. Yet it is a theoretical presence.

It is the Security Council that is paralyzed: Putin’s Russia, the invader of Ukraine, is the cause, and China supports it—softly, but supports it nonetheless. Two out of five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council: impossible to make a decision!

What future for the United Nations? Dark. We must invent another machine for making peace. That big Washington meeting—was it useful? The UN was not even present. Your comparison with the League of Nations is accurate.

AB: The U.S. administration recently dismantled USAID, drastically cut budgets, and altered priorities and methods. Similarly, in Europe, the UK, Germany, France, and others are suddenly cutting humanitarian and development funding. How do you explain these choices, and what consequences might they have?

BK: Yes, it is an assassination, but why rely so heavily on the U.S.? Was this country our life insurance for nearly 70 years? We often criticized it while calling on it in serious situations. Military operations in Africa often received American material and financial support. Washington’s aid helped reinforce our social protection measures, allowing the French to reap the so-called “dividends of peace.” We paid little attention to others, unlike NGOs. None of our military operations could have happened without U.S. support. Our children attended schools overseas, music, sports—all influenced by the Americans.

It would be too easy to dwell on 1939–45 and D-Day. But let us remember: we cannot break with Americans simply because we doubt Trump’s stability.

AB: The drop in aid funding is accompanied by a weakening of international humanitarian law, protection of civilians, and access to relief, as seen in Sudan, Ukraine, and Gaza, where famine is used as a weapon of war killing innocents. Are we heading toward acceptance of the worst and the impotence of the law?

BK: Birth rates, capitalist success, poverty, disrespect for the law—multiple factors mix and clash. I regret this regression of commitments.

AB: Humanitarians feel less supported, even criticized. How can one speak to a public primarily concerned with purchasing power and insecurity about an uncertain future?

BK: Humanitarian action, thanks to NGOs, large and small, has been one of the major advances of political consciousness. It was about standing with others, with poor countries, requiring strong economies in rich countries.

Bernard Kouchner (right) in Afghanistan in 1985 with Commander Amin Wardak (left) and Alain Boinet. ©José Nicolas SIPA Press

You mention an uncertain future—is this a war against Putin’s army? The defeat or alleged betrayal of Putin, Trump, or both? The previous simplistic dichotomy of capitalism versus socialism was convenient but too simplistic. Society has evolved beyond those rigid labels. Yet France remains a country where, despite the crisis, life is still good.

AB: In L’heure des prédateurs, Giuliano Da Empoli writes: “In Libya, the Middle East, Ukraine: the edges of the continent that rebuilt itself on peace are now battlefields; war penetrates further into Europe’s borders.” Given this, should we prepare for possible war and arm ourselves accordingly?

BK: All indications point to a warlike reality. I do not know if conflict is imminent, but we must prepare. Again, despite illusions, we must build a “Europe of defense,” not a European army. The path is long, but the necessity is clear.

History forgets, so let us remember: it was Gorbachev and Yeltsin who granted Ukraine independence and accepted the referendum. Disturbances in 1984 marked conflict between Russian speakers and Ukrainians. Putin, after 20 years of dictatorship, launched a “special operation” and sent his army to seize power in Kyiv. Let us salute the courage of Ukrainians and the tenacity of President Zelensky.

AB: According to the UN (OCHA), $47.4 billion is needed this year to assist 189.5 million people in 72 countries. Forecasts suggest contributions may reach only a fifth, or less. The human consequences would be catastrophic. What message would you send to policymakers about this real risk?

BK: I advocate rescuing as many people in danger as possible. I have done so my entire life. But it is too easy to separate humanitarian action from politics. In these dangerous times, we must bring them closer without conflating them. With limited funds, we must innovate to continue emergency response and development aid.

We all dream of changing the world, and this is why we must closely follow political realities while addressing humanitarian needs. Is it possible? I believe so—it is not forbidden to dream.

AB: How would you like to conclude this interview?

BK: Current times try to make us despair; let us not despair and continue to believe in Humanitarianism. Politics will try to catch up.

Recently, Gérard Chaliand, a man of tenacity and loyalty, passed away. He had seen everything, understood everything, and, as they say, never flaunted his knowledge. I have remembered him since I was 20. He was a model of intellectual honesty and rare courage. He spoke with gentleness and gravity about what he observed, never speaking ill of others. A rare man who approached geopolitics with a poet’s eye—and friendship. Farewell, Gérard.

Bernard Kouchner

Co-founder of Doctors Without Borders and Doctors of the World. Former Minister of Health, former Minister of Foreign Affairs.

 

 

 

 

I invite you to read these interviews and articles published in the edition :